Stewart v. Aranas, et al.

Filing 83

ORDER granting ECF No. 82 Stipulation : Response to ECF No. 81 Motion to Strike due by 9/18/2020. Signed by Chief Judge Miranda M. Du on 9/10/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)

Case 3:17-cv-00132-MMD-CLB Document 83 Filed 09/10/20 Page 1 of 2

1
2
3
4

LAGOMARSINO LAW
ANDRE M. LAGOMARSINO, ESQ.
3005 W. Horizon Ridge Pkwy., Suite 241
Henderson, Nevada 89052
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
[e-mail]
Attorney for Plaintiff Lewis Stewart

5

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

6

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

7
LEWIS STEWART, an individual,

Case No.: 3:17-cv-00132-MMD-CLB

8
Plaintiff-Appellee
v.

11

ROMEO
ARANAS;
JAMES
COX;
FRANCISCO M. SANCHES; BRIAN E.
WILLIAMS,

12

14
Telephone [phone]

(First Request)

13

Defendants – Appellants,
and

15
16
17
18

CHERYL BURSON; S.L. CLARK; JAMES E.
DZURENDA; ANGIE JONES; SEAN SU;
STATE OF NEVADA
Defendants.

19
20
21

WHEREAS Defendants Romeo Aranas, James Cox, Francisco Sanchez and Brian Williams
collectively filed their Motion to Strike Portions of Plaintiff’s Reply (ECF No. 81) on August 24,
28

Facsimile [phone]

10

STIPULATION AND ORDER TO
EXTEND PLAINTIFF’S DEADLINE TO
FILE HIS RESPONSE TO
DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO STRIKE
PORTIONS PLAINTIFF’S REPLY
(ECF NO. 81)

22

2020 relating to Plaintiff’s Reply to his Motion to Vacate the Stay Pending Appeal and Request to

23

Certify Appeal as Frivolous (ECF No. 79) on August 4, 2020.

24

Pursuant to Local Rule IA 6-1(a), the parties hereby stipulate to extend the deadline for

25

plaintiff to file his response to defendants’ motion. The current deadline for plaintiff to respond to

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27

3005 W. Horizon Ridge Pkwy., #241, Henderson, Nevada 89052

LAGOMARSINO LAW

9

26

defendants’ motion is September 8, 2020. The new deadline for plaintiff to respond to defendants’

27
28

motion will be September 18, 2020.

Page 1 of 2

Case 3:17-cv-00132-MMD-CLB Document 83 Filed 09/10/20 Page 2 of 2

Good cause exists because one (1) of plaintiff’s associate attorneys has suddenly been

1
2

quarantined due to a possible exposure to COVID-19. As a firm of only three (3) attorneys, the

3

attorney that was tasked with drafting the response brief has had to cover the caseload for the

4

quarantined attorney resulting in a delay to draft the response. This unexpected coverage includes

5
6

coverage for multiple depositions, Equal Employment Opportunity Commission mediations and
additional briefing and discovery efforts on other matters that would have been otherwise allocated

7
8

for the drafting of a response brief.
This extension is the first request for an extension and is not submitted for the purpose of

Facsimile [phone]

10
11
12
13

delay.
IT IS SO STIPULATED AND AGREED.
DATED this 8th day of September, 2020.

DATED this 8th day of September, 2020.

LAGOMARSINO LAW

OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL

15
16
17

/s/ Andre M. Lagomarsino
Andre M. Lagomarsino, Esq. (#6711)
3005 W. Horizon Ridge Pkwy., #241
Henderson, Nevada 89052
Attorney for Plaintiff Lewis Stewart

.

_/S/ FRANK TODDRE II ___________________.
Frank Toddre II, Esq.
555 East Washington Avenue, Suite 3900
Las Vegas, Nevada 89101
Attorney for Defendants Romeo Aranas, James
Cox, Francisco Sanchez and Brian Williams

18
19
20

IT IS SO ORDERED.

21

___________________________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT JUDGE

22

DATED: ______________________________
September 10, 2020

28

Telephone [phone]

14

23
24

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27

3005 W. Horizon Ridge Pkwy., #241, Henderson, Nevada 89052

LAGOMARSINO LAW

9

25
26
27
28
Page 2 of 2