Moore v. Marshal et al

Filing 25

ORDER that the Magistrate Judge's Reports and Recommendation ECF No. 12 is ADOPTED AND ACCEPTED; that Plaintiff's Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis ECF No. 1 is GRANTED; Clerk directed to file the Complaint ECF No. 1 -1; the Complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; Clerk directed to close this case. Signed by Judge Robert C. Jones on 07/18/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KW)

Download PDF
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 4 5 RONALD WAYNE MOORE, 6 CASE NO.: 3:17-CV-00141-RCJ-VPC Plaintiff, ORDER 7 v. 8 HUGH ROY MARSHAL, et al., 9 Defendant. _______________________________________ 10 11 Before the Court is the Reports and Recommendations of U.S. Magistrate Judge (ECF #121) 12 entered on June 1, 2017, recommending that the Court grant Plaintiff’s Application to Proceed In Forma 13 Pauperis (ECF No. 1); file the Complaint (ECF No. 1-1) and dismiss the Complaint with prejudice. On 14 June 7, 2017, Plaintiff filed his Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Report and Recommendation (ECF 15 #13). 16 The Court has conducted it’s de novo review in this case, has fully considered the objections of 17 the Plaintiff, the pleadings and memoranda of the parties and other relevant matters of record pursuant 18 to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule IB 3-2. The Court determines that the Magistrate Judge’s 19 Reports and Recommendation (ECF #12) entered on June 1, 2017, should be ADOPTED AND 20 ACCEPTED. 21 22 23 24 25 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (ECF No. 1) is GRANTED; the Clerk shall file the Complaint (ECF No. 1-1). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Complaint is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. The Clerk of the Court shall close this case. IT IS SO ORDERED this 18th day of July, 2017. 26 27 _____________________________________ ROBERT C. JONES 28 1 Refers to court’s docket number.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?