Hollyvale Rental Holdings, LLC v. Rae Nola Edwards et al

Filing 36

ORDER granting Stipulation (ECF No. 34 ) to Extend Deadlines in Scheduling Order (ECF No 15 ). Signed by Magistrate Judge William G. Cobb on 9/11/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)

Case 3:17-cv-00162-MMD-WGC Document 34 Filed 09/08/17 Page 1 of 5

1
2
3
4
5
6

LAUREL I. HANDLEY (NV Bar # 9576)
ANTHONY R. SASSI (NV Bar # 12486)
ALDRIDGE PITE, LLP
520 South 4th St., Suite 360
Las Vegas, Nevada 89101
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
E-Mail: [e-mail]
Attorneys for Defendant/Counterclaimant:
FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE ASSOCIATION

7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

9

HOLLYVALE RENTAL HOLDINGS, LLC,

10

Case No.: 3:17-cv-00162-MMD-WGC

Plaintiff,

11

v.

12

RAE NOLA EDWARDS, an individual;
FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE
ASSOCIATION; QUALITY LOAN
SERVICE CORPORATION; All other persons
unknown claiming any right, title estate, lien or
interest in the real property described in the
Complaint adverse to Plaintiff’s ownership, or
any cloud upon Plaintiff’s title thereto; DOES I
through V; and ROE Corporations I through V,

13
14
15
16
17

Defendants.

18
19

22
23

(First Request)

FEDERAL NATIONAL MORTGAGE
ASSOCATION,

20
21

STIPULATION TO EXTEND DEADLINES
IN SCHEDULING ORDER

Counterclaimant,
v.
HOLLYVALE RENTAL HOLDINGS, LLC
Counter-Defendant.

24
25

Defendant/Counterclaimant Federal National Mortgage Association (“Fannie Mae”) and

26

Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Hollyvale Rental Holding, LLC (“Hollyvale”) (and collectively the

27

“Parties”), by and through their respective attorneys of record, hereby stipulate to extend all of

28

the deadlines in the Scheduling Order (ECF No. 15) as follows:
-1-

Case 3:17-cv-00162-MMD-WGC Document 34 Filed 09/08/17 Page 2 of 5

BACKGROUND & REASONS FOR REQUESTED EXTENSIONS

1
2

This is the Parties’ first request to extend the deadlines in the Scheduling Order. As the

3

Court may be aware, this is one of many actions involving a title dispute to real property

4

following a foreclosure sale under NRS 116.

5

following the sale of a super-priority lien, while Fannie Mae’s primary defense or counterclaim

6

is that its deed of trust was not extinguished because of the Federal Foreclosure Bar under 12

7

U.S.C. § 4617(j)(3). Quality Loan is the trustee under Fannie Mae’s deed of trust and has taken

8

a non-monetary status position.

Hollyvale claims it has free and clear title

9

Pursuant to Local Rule 26-1, Hollyvale, Fannie Mae and Quality Loan submitted a

10

Stipulated Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order on May 5, 2017 (ECF No. 14) and the Court

11

issued a scheduling order on May 8, 2017 (ECF No. 15). The Parties have exchanged initial

12

disclosures, have begun written discovery, and have engaged in extensive settlement discussions.

13

These series of events have lead the Parties to believe that additional parties should be added

14

and/or substituted into this case and that all of the deadlines in the Scheduling Order should be

15

extended.

16

Since the filing of this lawsuit in January 2017, Hollyvale has transferred its interest in

17

the real property at issue to an affiliate or related entity known as Champery Rental REO, LLC

18

(“Champery”). The Parties are in the process of finalizing a separate stipulation to effectuate the

19

substitution of Champery in the place and stead of Hollyvale. Since the Parties’ ultimate goal is

20

to clear up title to the property at issue, whether through adjudication or settlement, Champery

21

should be formally included as a party to this lawsuit.

22

Also, Hollyvale/Champery wishes to add the foreclosing HOA and its trustee as

23

defendants to this lawsuit. Fannie Mae has no objection to adding either entity. In fact, adding

24

the foreclosing HOA and its trustee will further assist in settlement efforts as it is believed that

25

the foreclosing HOA or its trustee is still holding excess proceeds of around $70,000.00 from the

26

sale which will ultimately either need to be distributed pursuant to NRS 116.31164 or may need

27

to be returned to Hollyvale/Champery if the sale is determined to be void. Such funds could be

28

used in furtherance of settlement efforts between Hollyvale/Champery and Fannie Mae.
-2-

Case 3:17-cv-00162-MMD-WGC Document 34 Filed 09/08/17 Page 3 of 5

1

Including both entities should also lead to a final and efficient adjudication as to title and

2

proceeds distribution.

3

Further adding to the need for an extension of all deadlines, Hollyvale/Champery and

4

Fannie Mae have engaged in extensive and complex settlement discussions since early to mid-

5

July. Such discussions not only involve the property at issue in this case, but several other

6

properties currently owned by Hollyvale/Champery (or their affiliates) and where Fannie Mae or

7

Freddie Mac is claiming an interest.

8

Mae/Freddie Mac are attempting to arrive at a global settlement involving all of their properties.

9

Both have spent considerable time over the past two months researching and gathering data on

10

the properties to be included in a proposed global settlement, and more time is still needed. Of

11

course the overarching purpose of such a global settlement is to avoid the time and expense

12

associated with litigation.

13

achievable.

In other words, Hollyvale/Champery and Fannie

Both parties are currently optimistic that a global settlement is

LR 26-4

14

Since the discovery deadline is being affected by this Stipulation, the Parties submit the

15
16

following pursuant to LR 26-4.

17

A.

Discovery that has been completed.

18

The Parties have exchanged their initial disclosures pursuant to FRCP 26. On August 15,

19

2017, and in the midst of settlement discussions, Hollyvale served requests for admission,

20

requests for production, and interrogatories on Fannie Mae.

21

B.

Discovery that needs to be completed.

22

The Parties are optimistic that the ongoing settlement discussions will alleviate the need

23

for any further discovery and effectively resolve this case as well as several others. This will

24

undoubtedly save on time and litigation costs.

25

To the extent the Parties come to an impasse with settlement discussions, Fannie Mae

26

will need time to respond to the discovery requests mentioned in section A above.

27

Hollyvale/Champery believes it will need to conduct additional written discovery on claims in

28

the complaint, the affirmative defenses in an answer, experts may need to be disclosed, and
-3-

Case 3:17-cv-00162-MMD-WGC Document 34 Filed 09/08/17 Page 4 of 5

1

expert discovery. The Parties also anticipate the foreclosing HOA and/or its trustee will want the

2

opportunity to conduct discovery.

3

C.

4

Reason why the deadline was not satisfied or the remaining discovery was not
complete within the time limits set by the discovery plan.

5

The existing dates were based upon the parties present in the litigation at the time the

6

Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order was entered, and most importantly before settlement

7

discussions actively began in July. Since that time it has become clear that the presence of

8

additional parties would assist with a final adjudication of title and a complete settlement. The

9

Parties further note that this is a developing area of law with evolving precedents being

10

established within both the Ninth Circuit and Nevada State Courts. These ongoing developments

11

affect the discovery required by the Parties.

12

Hollyvale/Champery and Fannie Mae have also engaged in complex settlement

13

discussions involving a number of properties, as there are a number of cases between Hollyvale

14

or its affiliates and Fannie Mae. Both are diligently working towards a global settlement of all

15

matters to avoid the time of expense of discovery and further motion practice in this case and

16

several others. Hollyvale/Champery and Fannie Mae have spent considerable time researching

17

and gathering data concerning the properties to be included in a global settlement and presently

18

believe time is best allocated to fully exploring the ongoing global settlement rather than

19

potentially unnecessary discovery.

20

consuming over the past two months, but both parties believe that these discussions will resolve

21

not only the instant matter, but a number of other cases as well.

22

D.

These discussions are ongoing and have been time

Proposed schedule for completing all remaining discovery.

23

The Parties propose to extend the deadline to add parties and amend pleadings to

24

September 29, 2017. As for the remaining deadlines, including discovery, expert and dispositive

25

motions, the Parties propose a short stay of these deadlines for two primary reasons. First,

26

because of the ongoing settlement discussions. Second, because the foreclosing HOA and its

27

trustee will need to appear and will likely want to provide their input on a suitable discovery plan

28

and scheduling order. The Parties propose only a short 90-day stay through December 1, 2017.
-4-

Case 3:17-cv-00162-MMD-WGC Document 34 Filed 09/08/17 Page 5 of 5

1

The Parties will prepare a Joint Status Report as to settlement efforts, or if settlement efforts

2

have unexpectedly stalled, provide the Court with an updated Discovery Plan and Scheduling

3

Order with the foreclosing HOA and trustee’s involvement.

4

Based upon the foregoing, the Parties respectfully request that the Court extend the

5

deadlines in the Scheduling Order in accordance with this Stipulation.

6

DATED this ____ day of September, 2017.

7

HUTCHISON & STEFFEN, LLC

ALDRIDGE PITE, LLP

__/s/ Bradley G. Sims_____________
John T. Steffen (4390)
Bradley G. Sims (11713)
Peccole Professional Park
10080 West Alta Drive, Suite 200
Las Vegas, NV 89145
[e-mail]
Attorneys for Plaintiff
Hollyvale Rental Holdings, LLC

__/s/ Anthony R. Sassi___________________
Laurel I. Handley (9576)
Anthony R. Sassi (12486)
520 South 4th Street, Suite 360
Las Vegas, NV 89101
[e-mail]
Attorneys for Defendant
Federal National Mortgage Association

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19

IT IS SO ORDERED.
_____________________________________
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

20
21

September 11, 2017
Dated: __________________________

22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-5-