Webb v. St. Mary's et al
Filing
10
ORDER that this action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for Plaintiff's failure to comply with Order ECF No. 9 ; Plaintiff's Motion ECF No. 8 is DENIED AS MOOT; Clerk directed to close case. Signed by Judge Robert C. Jones on 12/7/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KW)
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
8
TRACY WEBB,
9
Plaintiff,
10
11
12
Case No.: 3:17-CV-00223-RCJ-VPC
ORDER OF DISMISSAL
vs.
ST. MARY’S, et al.,
Defendants.
13
14
On June 24, 2017, this Court entered Order (ECF No. 9) denying Plaintiff’s Motion to
15
16
Proceed In Forma Pauperis (ECF No. 1) and Motions (ECF Nos. 3, 5, 6) without prejudice. The
17
Order directed Plaintiff to complete application or pay full filing fees within twenty-eight (28)
18
days or the Court may dismiss without prejudice.
19
Plaintiff has failed to show good cause why this action should not be dismissed without
20
21
prejudice for failure to comply with Court Order (ECF No. 9). Accordingly,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for
22
23
Plaintiff’s failure to comply with the Court Order (ECF No. 9).
24
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Motion (ECF No. 8) is DENIED AS
25
MOOT.
26
27
28
///
///
ORDER OF DISMISSAL - 1
1
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall close the case.
2
IT IS SO ORDERED DATED this 7th day of December, 2017.
3
4
5
______________________________________
ROBERT C. JONES
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
ORDER OF DISMISSAL - 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?