Warren v. Nev. Dept. of Corr. et al
Filing
109
ORDER granting ECF No. 108 Motion to Extend Time. The deadline to serve responses to the outstanding discovery is Friday, November 6, 2020. Signed by Magistrate Judge William G. Cobb on 10/6/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - LW)
1
2
3
4
5
AARON D. FORD
Attorney General
PETER E. DUNKLEY, Bar No. 11110
Deputy Attorney General
State of Nevada
Public Safety Division
100 N. Carson Street
Carson City, NV 89701-4717
Tel: (775) 684-1259
E-mail: pdunkley@ag.nv.gov
6
7
Attorneys for Defendants
Quentin Byrne, Sheryl Foster, Joshua Kelly,
Stephen Powers, Ruben Vidaurri
8
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
11
KEITH A. WARREN,
12
Case No. 3:17-cv-00228-MMD-WGC
Plaintiff,
13
vs.
14
ORDER GRANTING
MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME
TO RESPOND TO DISCOVERY
REQUESTS
NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF
CORRECTIONS, et al.,
15
Defendants.
16
17
Defendants, Quentin Byrne, Sheryl Foster, Joshua Kelly, Stephen Powers, Ruben Vidaurri, by
18
and through counsel, Aaron D. Ford, Nevada Attorney General, and Peter E. Dunkley, hereby submit
19
this Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Discovery Responses to Plaintiff’s Discovery Requests,
20
Dated September 1, 2020, submitted to Lovelock Correctional Center’s law library on September 4,
21
2020, and received by the Office of the Attorney General on September 9, 2020. This Motion is based
22
on Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 6(b)(1)(A), the following Memorandum of Points and Authorities,
23
and all papers and pleadings on file in this action.
MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES
24
25
I.
INTRODUCTION
26
Defendants request additional time to respond to outstanding Requests for Production of
27
Documents, without waiving objections, because of the administrative obstacles at the Office of
28
the Attorney General (OAG), related to the response to COVID-19.
1
1
State-wide, and OAG wide policies and technological limitations have affected the
2
effectiveness of communications and the ability to efficiently compile documents and evidence, from
3
outside the office.
4
Defendants respectfully request an extension of 29 days from the date the requests were post-
5
marked, September 8, for a new deadline of November 6, 2020. In summary, Defendants request until
6
November 6, 2020 for the following discovery:
7
1. Requests for Production of Documents to:
a. Foster
b. Byrne
c. Powers
d. Kelly
e. Vidaurri
2. Requests for Admissions to:
a. Byrne (set three)
b. Foster (set four)
3. Interrogatories to:
a. Vidaurri (set two)
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
II.
ARGUMENT
16
Defendants respectfully requests a 29-day extension of time from the current deadline (based on
17
post-mark) to serve responses to Plaintiff’s to the outstanding discovery as set forth above. Federal
18
Rule of Civil Procedure 6(b)(1) governs extensions of time and provides as follows:
19
20
21
When an act may or must be done within a specified time, the court may,
for good cause, extend the time: (A) with or without motion or notice if
the court acts, or if a request is made, before the original time or its
extension expires; or (B) on motion made after the time has expired if the
party failed to act because of excusable neglect.
22
23
“The district court is given broad discretion in supervising the pretrial phase of litigation….” Zivkovic v. S.
24
California Edison Co., 302 F.3d 1080, 1087 (9th Cir. 2002) (citation omitted).
25
Defendants assert that the requisite good cause is present to warrant the requested extension of
26
time. This request has been necessitated by ongoing quarantine measures imposed in response to the
27
COVID-19 virus pandemic. Defendants make the instant request in light of the current issues related to
28
COVID-19 including Nevada Governor Sisolak’s March 31, 2020 Declaration of Emergency (Directive
2
1
010) – ‘Stay at Home Order’ and the Governor’s April 1, 2020 “Stay at Home” directive. In response, the
2
Office of the Attorney General (OAG) has directed all AOG employees to comply with the Governor’s
3
directives and orders. The OAG is limiting (and in some instances, restricting completely) in-office work,
4
and instructing employees to stay at home and to work from home to the extent possible. The OAG, and
5
the State Nevada information technology staff have been working to fully implement alternate, home-
6
based working arrangements. As a result, the already limited staff at the OAG is rendered less efficient
7
due to constraints imposed by limited Virtual Private Networks (VPN) and lack of remote document
8
access, along with a recent quarantine of the undersigned. In light of Governor’s directives, the OAG’s
9
policies, the information technologies limitations, and due to the functional difficulties the instant
10
circumstances place on accessing and obtaining the necessary supporting documents, including
11
correspondence between the OAG and Defendants, Defendants respectfully request that the Court extend
12
the time to respond to the discovery until November 6, 2020.
13
Defendants’ request is timely and will not hinder or prejudice Plaintiff’s case, but will allow for
14
the OAG to have sufficient time to obtain documents and communicate with defendants in order to
15
respond. Close of discovery is currently set for December 7, 2020 (ECF No. 103).
16
For these reasons, Defendant respectfully requests a twenty nine (29) day extension of time
17
from October 9, to serve responses to the requests for production of documents in this case, with a new
18
deadline up to and including Friday, November 6, 2020.
19
///
20
///
21
///
22
///
23
///
24
///
25
///
26
///
27
///
28
///
3
1
DEADLINE
2
The Deadline for outstanding discovery as set forth above: Friday, November 6, 2020.
3
4
5
6
7
DATED this 5th day of October 2020.
AARON D. FORD
Attorney General
By:
/s/ Peter E. Dunkley
PETER E. DUNKLEY, Bar No. 11110
Deputy Attorney General
Attorneys for Defendants
8
9
10
IT IS SO ORDERED:
11
__________________________________________
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
12
October 6, 2020
DATED:__________________
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
4
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?