Matheny v. Social Security Administration
Filing
4
ORDER ADOPTING and ACCEPTING the Report and Recommendation of the United States Magistrate Judge ECF No. 3 ; Plaintiff's Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis ECF No. 1 is GRANTED; Clerk directed to file Plaintiff's Complaint ECF No. 1 -1); this action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE; Clerk directed to close this case. Signed by Judge Robert C. Jones on 08/22/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KW)
1
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
2
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
3
4
KATHY GRAY MATHENY,
5
Plaintiff,
6
v.
7
SOCIAL SECURITY ADMINISTRATION,
8
Defendant.
* **
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
CASE NO.: 3:17-CV-00269-RCJ-VPC
ORDER
9
10
The Court has considered the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate
11
(ECF No. 3) entered on July 24, 2017, in which the Magistrate Judge recommends the Court grant
12
Plaintiff’s Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (ECF No. 1); file Plaintiff’s Complaint (ECF No.
13
1-1) and dismiss this action with prejudice. The Court has considered the pleadings and memoranda
14
of the parties and other relevant matters of record and has made a review and determination in
15
accordance with the requirements of 28 U.S.C. § 636 and applicable case law, and good cause
16
appearing, the court hereby
17
ADOPTS AND ACCEPTS the Report and Recommendation of the United States
18
Magistrate Judge (ECF No. 3).
19
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED Plaintiff’s Application to Proceed In Forma Pauperis (ECF
20
No. 1) is GRANTED.
21
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall file Plaintiff’s Complaint
22
(ECF No. 1-1).
23
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE.
24
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall close this case.
25
IT IS SO ORDERED this 22nd day of August, 2017.
26
_______________________________
ROBERT C. JONES
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?