Hazelett v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.
Filing
73
ORDER - The parties are directed to file a joint status report within seven days from the date of this order to address whether the Court should resolve this issue as briefed or whether the Court should permit supplemental brief. Signed by Chief Judge Miranda M. Du on 10/29/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - LW)
Case 3:17-cv-00274-MMD-CLB Document 73 Filed 10/29/20 Page 1 of 1
1
2
3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
4
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
5
***
6
STEFANY HAZELETT,
Case No. 3:17-cv-00274-MMD-CLB
Plaintiff,
7
v.
ORDER
8
9
10
WAL-MART STORES, INC.,
Defendant.
11
12
This Court previously granted summary judgment in favor of Defendants. (ECF No.
13
63.) On appeal, the Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit reversed and remanded for trial
14
on two of the claims—violations of the Family Medical Leave Act (“FMLA”) and the
15
Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”). (ECF No. 70.) Accordingly, the Court’s order
16
granting summary judgment (ECF No. 63) is vacated as to those two claims. The
17
Judgment (ECF No. 64) is similarly vacated as to those two claims.
18
The court of appeals noted that the Court should address Defendant’s argument
19
in its motion for summary judgment that the ADA claim is time-barred. (ECF No. 70 at 10
20
n. 2.) The parties are directed to file a joint status report within seven days from the date
21
of this order to address whether the Court should resolve this issue as briefed or whether
22
the Court should permit supplemental brief.
23
DATED THIS 29th day of October 2020.
24
25
26
27
28
MIRANDA M. DU
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?