Fitzgearld v. Martin et al

Filing 142

ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR MORE COMPLETE STATEMENT BY PROVIDING BATES STAMPS USED IN MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (ECF No. 129 ). The motion for more complete statement by providing Bates stamps used for motion for summary judgment is DENIED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carla Baldwin on 4/15/2022. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - HKL)

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

2

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

3

***

4

MARTY SCOTT FITZGERALD,

5
6
7

Case No. 3:17-CV-0278-MMD-CLB
Plaintiff,

v.

ORDER DENYING MOTION
FOR MORE COMPLETE STATEMENT BY
PROVIDING BATES STAMPS USED IN
MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT

LPN GREG MARTIN, et al.,
[ECF No. 129]

8

Defendants.

9
10

Before the Court is Plaintiff Marty Scott Fitzgerald’s (“Fitzgerald”) motion for more

11

complete statement by providing Bates stamps used in motion for summary judgment.

12

(ECF No. 129.) In this motion Fitzgerald states that he is having trouble following

13

Defendants’ motion for summary judgment because Defendants do not identify the Bates

14

numbers of their exhibits. (Id.) Apparently, Fitzgerald seeks Defendants to refile the

15

motion to comport with his request.

16

The Court has reviewed the motion for summary judgment and its attachments.

17

(ECF Nos. 103, 105.) Although 122 pages of exhibits and declarations are attached, they

18

are separated into 14 separate exhibits (91 pages) and 11 declarations (31 pages). (Id.)

19

None of the exhibits are individually voluminous, and Defendants included an index of

20

exhibits in their motion. (ECF No. 103 at 12.) The Court finds the references to exhibit

21

numbers and corresponding dates are adequate and proper. The motion for more

22

complete statement by providing Bates stamps used for motion for summary judgment is

23

DENIED. (ECF No. 129.)

24
25
26
27
28

April 15, 2022
DATED: ______________.

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE