Rimer et al v. Coumou et al

Filing 39

ORDER pursuant to ECF No. 38 USCA Order (USCA Case No. 17-17509), this Court certifies that Plaintiffs' appeal from its order of dismissal is not frivolous and their in forma pauperis should continue on appeal (e-service USCA on 01/05/2018). Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 1/5/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KW)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 8 *** 9 STANLEY RIMER, BRIAN O’KEEFE, JOHN ROSKY, RICHARD LANCASTER, Case No. 3:17-cv-00281-MMD-WGC 10 Plaintiffs, 11 12 13 ORDER v. LUCINDA COUMOU, et al., Defendants. 14 15 This matter is referred to the Court for the limited purpose of determining whether 16 in forma pauperis status should continue on appeal. (ECF No. 38.) This Court certifies 17 that Plaintiffs’ appeal from its order of dismissal is not frivolous and their in forma 18 pauperis should continue on appeal. 19 DATED THIS 5th day of January 2018. 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 MIRANDA M. DU UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?