Rimer et al v. Coumou et al
Filing
39
ORDER pursuant to ECF No. 38 USCA Order (USCA Case No. 17-17509), this Court certifies that Plaintiffs' appeal from its order of dismissal is not frivolous and their in forma pauperis should continue on appeal (e-service USCA on 01/05/2018). Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 1/5/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KW)
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
8
***
9
STANLEY RIMER, BRIAN O’KEEFE,
JOHN ROSKY, RICHARD LANCASTER,
Case No. 3:17-cv-00281-MMD-WGC
10
Plaintiffs,
11
12
13
ORDER
v.
LUCINDA COUMOU, et al.,
Defendants.
14
15
This matter is referred to the Court for the limited purpose of determining whether
16
in forma pauperis status should continue on appeal. (ECF No. 38.) This Court certifies
17
that Plaintiffs’ appeal from its order of dismissal is not frivolous and their in forma
18
pauperis should continue on appeal.
19
DATED THIS 5th day of January 2018.
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
MIRANDA M. DU
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?