O'Doan v. Sanford et al

Filing 41

ORDER granting ECF No. 40 Stipulation Requesting Extension of Time to Respond to EFC No. 39 Motion for Summary Judgment. Plaintiff's response due by 4/24/2018. Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 4/6/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - LH)

Case 3:17-cv-00293-LRH-VPC Document 40 Filed 04/06/18 Page 1 of 3

Luke Andrew Busby, Ltd. 
Nevada State Bar No. 10319 
316 California Ave 82 
Reno, NV 89509 
775-453-0112 
[e-mail] 
Attorney for the Plaintiff 
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 
DISTRICT OF NEVADA  

JAMES O’DOAN, 
Plaintiff(s), 
vs. 

RENO POLICE OFFICER JOSHUA 
SANFORD, RENO POLICE 
OFFICER CADE LEAVITT, and 
THE CITY OF RENO, a political 
subdivision of the State of Nevada; and 
JOHN DOES I through X, inclusive 
Defendant(s). 
________________________________/ 

Case No. 3:17-cv-00293-LRH-VPC 
ORDER APPROVING
STIPULATION REQUESTING 
EXTENSION OF TIME TO 
RESPOND TO MOTION FOR 
SUMMARY JUDGMENT 

FIRST REQUEST 

COMES  NOW,  JAMES  O’DOAN  (“Plaintiff”)  and  RENO  POLICE  OFFICER 
JOSHUA  SANFORD,  RENO  POLICE  OFFICER  CADE  LEAVITT, and THE CITY OF 
RENO,  a  political  subdivision  of  the  State  of  Nevada,  (collectively  “Defendants”)  by  and 
through  the  undersigned  counsel,  and  hereby  stipulate  and  request  a  one week extension for 
the  Plaintiff  to  file  a  response  to  the  Defendant's  March  27,  2018  Motion  for  Summary 
Judgment.  Currently,  the  Plaintiff’s  response  is  due  on  April  17,  2018.  The  parties  request 

1 

Case 3:17-cv-00293-LRH-VPC Document 40 Filed 04/06/18 Page 2 of 3

that the due date be extended to April 24, 2018.  
This is the first request for an extension of this deadline. 
The  reason  for  seeking  this  extension  is  that  counsel  for  the  Plaintiff  has  a  matter 
scheduled  for  trial  in  Nevada  District  Court  the  week  of  April  9,  2018,  which  will 
substantially  reduce  the  amount  of  time  available  to  draft  an  adequate  response  to  the 
Defendant’s  Motion.  Further,  this  matter  involves  subtle  and  nuanced  issues  of  law  and  of 
fact that deserve full treatment and analysis by the parties.  
BASED  ON  THE  FOREGOING,  the  parties  request  a  one  week  extension  of  the 
deadline described above.  
IT IS SO STIPULATED.  

/s/ Mark Hughs
4/6/2018
By: ___________________________________ Dated:_________ 

Mark Hughs, Esq.  
Reno City Attorney  
1 East First St.  
Reno, Nevada 89501 

Attorney for the Defendants 
/s/ Luke Busby
4/6/2018
By: ___________________________________ Dated:_________ 

Luke Andrew Busby, Ltd. 
Nevada State Bar No. 10319 
316 California Ave 82 
Reno, NV 89509 
775-453-0112 
[e-mail] 
Attorneys for the Plaintiff 

2 

Case 3:17-cv-00293-LRH-VPC Document 40 Filed 04/06/18 Page 3 of 3

ORDER 
IT IS SO ORDERED. 
4/6/18
_____________________ 

DATED 
_____________________________________ 
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE  
LARRY R. HICKS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

3