Evans v. Baker et al

Filing 33

ORDER that Respondents' motions for extension of time (ECF Nos. 28 , 29 , 30 ) are all granted nunc pro tunc as of their respective filing dates. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 2/14/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - LH)

1
2
3
4
5
6

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

7

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

8

***

9

MICHAEL PAUL EVANS,

10

Case No. 3:17-cv-00347-MMD-WGC
Petitioner,

ORDER

v.
11
12

RENEE BAKER, et al.,

13

Respondents.

14
15

Pending before the court in this habeas corpus proceeding are three motions to

16

extend time filed by the Respondents in relation to the filing and service of their answer.

17

(ECF Nos. 28, 29, 30.) All three motions are supported by good cause. In addition,

18

Respondents filed their answer on July 13, 2018, without apparent prejudice to the

19

Petitioner. (ECF No. 31.)

20
21
22

It is therefore ordered that Respondents’ motions for extension of time (ECF Nos.
28, 29, 30) are all granted nunc pro tunc as of their respective filing dates.
DATED THIS 14th day of February 2019.

23
24
25
26
27
28

MIRANDA M. DU
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE