Erickson v. Sterling Life Insurance Company

Filing 21

ORDER granting ECF No. 20 Stipulation : Response to ECF No. 6 MOTION for Summary Judgment due by 8/2/2017. Signed by Judge Howard D. McKibben on 7/28/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 Vernon E. Leverty, Esq. State Bar No. 1266 Patrick R. Leverty, Esq. State Bar No. 8840 LEVERTY & ASSOCIATES LAW CHTD. 832 Willow Street Reno, Nevada 89502 Ph. (775) 322-6636 E-mail: gene@levertylaw.com pat@levertylaw.com Attorneys for Terri Erickson 7 UNITED STATED DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA 8 TERRI ERICKSON CASE NO. 3:17-CV-00354-HDM-VPC ORDER GRANTING REQUEST FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 9 Plaintiff, 10 v. 11 STERLING LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY 12 Defendant. _______________________________________/ (THIRD REQUEST) 13 The parties request and stipulate that plaintiff Terri Erickson shall have a three-day 14 extension of time, up to and including August 2, 2017, to respond to defendant Sterling Life 15 Insurance Company’s Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 6), filed June 28, 2017. This is 16 the third extension requested by the parties. This extension is requested and extended to 17 accommodate the schedules and workloads of counsel, and not for reasons of delay. 18 DATED: This 27th day of July, 2017. DATED: This 27th day of July, 2017. LEVERTY & ASSOCIATES LAW CHTD. LEWIS ROCA ROTHGERBER CHRISTIE, LLP /S/ Patrick Leverty Vernon E. Leverty (SBN 1266) Patrick R. Leverty (SBN 8840) 832 Willow St. Reno, NV 89502 Attorneys for Plaintiff Terri Erickson /S/ David McElhinney (w/ permission) David C. McElhinney (SBN 33) Ann-Martha Adrews (SBN 7585) Nicole M. True (SBN 12879) 3993 Howard Hughes Pkwy, Ste. 600 Las Vegas, NV 89169-5996 Attorneys for Defendant Sterling Life Insurance Company 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 IT IS SO ORDERED DATED: July 28, 2017 ___________________________________ District Judge Howard D. McKibben

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?