Williams v. Marks et al

Filing 93

ORDER that the court's order of October 29, 2019 (ECF No. 76 ) is STAYED. Defendants' Motion for Reconsideration (ECF No. 85 ) and Plaintiff's Motion for Contempt and Applicable Sanctions (ECF No. 89 ) are DENIED without prejudice and any existing deadlines pertaining to briefing of these motions are VACATED. The court will also set a briefing schedule and a hearing date. Signed by Magistrate Judge William G. Cobb on 12/9/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - LH)

Download PDF
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 MICHAEL WILLIAMS, Case No.: 3:17-cv-00355-MMD-WGC 4 Plaintiff, 5 6 vs. 7 ORDER MARKS, et al., 8 Defendants. 9 10 The court will establish new deadlines for the parties to address the interpretation of Nevada 11 Department of Corrections Administrative Regulation (AR) 639 and the provisions therein including, 12 (1) whether an inmate who is personally involved in a civil rights lawsuit directly involving medical issues 13 may possess copies of the inmate’s medical records relevant to the lawsuit’s medical issues 14 [AR 639.02(8)], and (2) whether an inmate involved in such litigation, if indigent, will be provided copies 15 of such relevant records [AR 639.02(7)(c)]. In the meantime, the court’s order of October 29, 2019 16 (ECF No. 76) is STAYED. 17 Therefore, Defendants’ Motion for Reconsideration (ECF No. 85) and Plaintiff’s Motion for 18 Contempt and Applicable Sanctions (ECF No. 89) are DENIED without prejudice and any existing 19 deadlines pertaining to briefing of these motions are VACATED. The court will also set a briefing 20 schedule and a hearing date. 21 IT IS SO ORDERED. 22 DATED: December 9, 2019. 23 24 25 ______________________________________ WILLIAM G. COBB UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?