Greene v. State of Nevada et al
Filing
86
ORDER that the Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 79 ) is ADOPTED and ACCEPTED; Intervenors' Motion to Intervene (ECF No. 69 ) is DENIED. Signed by Judge Robert C. Jones on 5/28/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - LH)
1
2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT CCOURT
3
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
4
5
6
ARTHUR BERAHA,
7
8
Plaintiff,
vs.
9
10
STATE OF NEVADA, et al.,
Defendants.
11
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No.: 3:17-CV-00366-RCJ-CBC
ORDER ADOPTING AND ACCEPTING
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
(ECF NO. 79)
12
13
14
Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate
Judge Carla Baldwin Carry (ECF No. 79 1) entered on May 8, 2019, recommending that
15
16
the Court deny the Intervenors’ Motion to Intervene (ECF No. 69). On May 22, 2019,
17
the proposed Intervenor filed his Objections to Magistrate Judge’s Report and
18
Recommendation (ECF No. 82).
19
This action was referred to Magistrate Judge Carry under 28 U.S.C. §
20
636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule IB 1-4 of the Rules of Practice of the United States District
21
22
23
24
25
Court for the District of Nevada.
The Court has conducted its de novo review in this case, has fully considered the
pleadings and memoranda of the parties including the parties’ objections to the Report
and Recommendation and other relevant matters to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local
26
27
28
Rule IB 3-2.
1
Refers to Court’s docket number.
1
1
2
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that United States Magistrate Judge Carry’s Report
and Recommendation (ECF No. 79), shall be ADOPTED and ACCEPTED.
3
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Intervenors’ Motion to Intervene (ECF No. 69).
4
5
6
7
Is DENIED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated this 28th day of May, 2019.
8
9
10
ROBERT C. JONES
Senior District Judge
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?