Almy v. Adams et al

Filing 56

ORDER granting ECF No. 55 Motion to Extend Time. Stipulation to dismiss this case is due by 7/5/2022. Signed by Magistrate Judge Craig S. Denney on 6/1/2022. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - HKL)

Case 3:17-cv-00390-RCJ-CSD Document 56 Filed 06/01/22 Page 1 of 2
1

5

AARON D. FORD
Attorney General
DAVID A. BAILEY, Bar No. 13661
Deputy Attorney General
State of Nevada
100 N. Carson Street
Carson City, Nevada 89701-4717
Tel: [phone]
E-mail: [e-mail]

6

Attorneys for Defendants

2
3
4

7
8

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

10

KEVIN ALMY,

11

Case No. 3:17-cv-00390-RCJ-CSD

Plaintiff,

12

v.

13

ADAMS, et al.,

14

Defendants.

ORDER GRANTING
MOTION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME
TO SUBMIT STIPULATION TO
DISMISS

15
16

Aaron D. Ford, Attorney General of the State of Nevada, and David A. Bailey,

17

Deputy Attorney General, appearing under their Limited Notice of Appearance, hereby

18

submit this motion requesting an additional 30 days to submit the stipulation to dismiss this

19

case. This request is made and based on the attached points and authorities, the papers

20

and pleadings on file herein, and such other and further information as this Court may

21

deem appropriate.

22

MEMORANDUM OF POINTS AND AUTHORITIES

23

Courts have inherent powers to control their dockets, see Ready Transp., Inc. v. AAR

24

Mfg, Inc., 627 F.3d 402, 404 (citations omitted), and to “achieve the orderly and expeditious

25

disposition of cases.” Chambers v. NASCO, Inc., 501 U.S. 32, 43 (1991) “Such power is

26

indispensable to the court’s ability to enforce its orders, manage its docket, and regulate

27

insubordinate [] conduct. Id. (citing Mazzeo v. Gibbons, No. 2:08–cv01387–RLH–PAL, 2010

28

WL 3910072, at *2 (D.Nev.2010)).

Page 1

Case 3:17-cv-00390-RCJ-CSD Document 56 Filed 06/01/22 Page 2 of 2
1
2
3
4
5

LR IA 6-1 discusses requests for continuances. The rule states:
(a) A motion or stipulation to extend time must state the reasons
for the extension requested and must inform the court of all
previous extensions of the subject deadline the court granted.
(Examples: “This is the first stipulation for extension of time
to file motions.” “This is the third motion to extend time to take
discovery.”)

6

This is the first request, and is requested for good cause. During a telephonic meet-

7

and-confer on May 27, 2022, Undersigned Counsel confirmed Plaintiff had not received a

8

copy of the proposed stipulation to dismiss despite it being mailed and emailed to Plaintiff

9

on May 3, 2022. Undersigned counsel will caused another copy to be mailed to Plaintiff.

10

The deadline to submit the stipulation to dismiss is June 3, 2022. ECF No. 53.

11

Therefore, the parties request an additional 30 days to file their stipulation to dismiss

12

this case, which would then be due on July 5, 2022, after adjusting for two court-non-

13

business days. See FED. R. CIV. P. 6(a)(1)(C).

14

DATED this 30th day of May 2022.

15

AARON D. FORD
Attorney General

16
17

By:

18

/s/ David A. Bailey
DAVID A. BAILEY, Bar No. 13661
Deputy Attorney General

19

Attorneys for Defendants

20
21
22
23
24
25

IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED: June 1, 2022.
______________________________________
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

26
27
28

Page 2