Miller v. Costco Wholesale Corp. et al

Filing 89

ORDER granting ECF No. 88 Stipulation : Response to ECF No. 86 Motion for Attorney Fees due by 1/14/2019. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 12/10/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 Michael Jay Leizerman (Pro Hac Vice) Rena Mara Leizerman (Pro Hac Vice) Leizerman & Associates 3450 W. Central Avenue, Suite 328 Toledo, OH 43606 Phone: (800) 628-4500 Facsimile: (888) 838-8828 Email: michael@leizerman.com rena@leizerman.com Matthew L. Sharp Nevada State Bar 4746 Law Office of Matthew L. Sharp 432 Ridge Street Reno, NV 89501 Phone: (775) 324-1500 Facsimile: (775) 284-0675 Email: matt@mattsharplaw.com Attorneys for Plaintiff Allen M. Miller 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 13 FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEVADA 14 ALLEN M. MILLER, 15 Plaintiff, 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 Case No.: 3:17-cv-00408-MMD-WCG v. C.H. ROBINSON WORLDWIDE, INC., RONEL R. SINGH, RHEAS TRANS, INC., And KUWAR SINGH dba RT SERVICE, Defendants. STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND TIME TO FILE RESPONSE TO DEFENDANT C.H. ROBINSON WORLDWIDE, INC.’S MOTION FOR ATTORNEY FEES AND NONTAXABLE COSTS Pursuant to Local Rule IA 6-1 and 7-1, the parties, by and through their respective counsel, hereby stipulate and request that this Court extend the deadline for plaintiff to file his response to Defendant C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc.’s Motion for Attorney Fees and Nontaxable Costs (Dkt. No. 86) until January 14, 2019. C.H. Robinson’s motion was filed on November 27, 2018. This is the first stipulation for extension of time to file a response to the motion. The present deadline for plaintiff to file his response is December 11, 2018. The parties stipulate to extend the 28 1 1 deadline for plaintiff to file and serve his response to Defendant C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc.’s 2 Motion for Attorney Fees and Nontaxable Costs to and including January 14, 2019. 3 4 5 Reasons for Request for Extension: Counsel for plaintiff need additional time due to the press of business and holidays. DATED: December 7, 2018 6 /s/ Michael Jay Leizerman Michael Jay Leizerman (Pro Hac Vice) Rena Mara Leizerman (Pro Hac Vice) Leizerman & Associates 3450 W. Central Avenue, Suite 328 Toledo, OH 43606 Phone: (800) 628-4500 Facsimile: (888) 838-8828 michael@leizerman.com rena@leizerman.com 7 8 9 10 11 12 Matthew L. Sharp Nevada State Bar 4746 Matthew L. Sharp, Ltd. 432 Ridge Street Reno, NV 89501 Phone: (775) 324-1500 Facsimile: (775) 284-0675 matt@mattsharplaw.com 13 14 15 16 17 Attorneys for Plaintiff Allen M. Miller 18 /s/ Michael A. Burke Michael A. Burke (SBN 11527) Michael E. Sullivan (SBN 5142) Robison, Sharp, Sullivan & Brust 71 Washington Street Reno, NV 89503 Phone: (775) 329-3151 Facsimile: (775) 329-7941 mburke@rssblaw.com msullivan@rssblaw.com 19 20 21 22 23 Attorneys for Defendant C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. 24 25 26 27 IT IS SO ORDERED. _____________________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Dated: _______________________________ December 10, 2018 28 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE Pursuant to FRCP 5 and LRIC 4-1, I hereby certify that on this 7th day of December, 2018, I electronically filed the foregoing with the Clerk of the Court by using the electronic filing system which served the following individuals electronically: Michael E. Sullivan Michael A. Burke Robison, Simons, Sharp & Brust 71 Washington Street Reno, NV 89503 msullivan@rssblaw.com mburke@rssblaw.com Attorneys for Defendant C.H. Robinson Worldwide, Inc. David M. Zaniel Ranalli, Zaniel, Fowler & Moran, LLC 50 West Liberty Street, Suite 1050 Reno, NV 89501 dzaniel@ranallilaw.com Attorney for Defendants Ronel Singh, Kuwar Singh & Rheas Trans, Inc. /s/ Michael Jay Leizerman Michael Jay Leizerman Attorney at Law 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?