Friedman v. Baca et al
Filing
228
ORDER - If there is no Motion for Substitution within 90 days of the date of this order, the Court will dismiss the case. Signed by Chief Judge Miranda M. Du on 1/13/2021. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - AB)
1
2
3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
4
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
5
***
6
KENNETH FRIEDMAN,
Case No. 3:17-cv-00433-MMD-WGC
Plaintiff,
7
ORDER
v.
8
ISIDRO BACA, et al.,
9
Defendants.
10
11
On July 17, 2017, Plaintiff Kenneth Friedman, then a prisoner in custody of the
12
Nevada Department of Corrections (“NDOC”), initiated this prisoner civil rights action
13
under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (ECF No. 1-1.) On February 7, 2018, the Court issued a
14
screening order and stayed the case to give the parties an opportunity to settle their
15
dispute. (ECF No. 10.) The parties were unable to reach an agreement, and the case
16
proceeded until Magistrate Judge William G. Cobb scheduled a settlement conference
17
for January 14, 2021. (ECF No. 223.) On December 18, 2020, Defendants filed a
18
suggestion of death on the record. (ECF No. 226.)
19
Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 25(a)(1), “[i]f a party dies and the claim
20
is not extinguished, the court may order substitution of the proper party. A motion for
21
substitution may be made by any party or by the decedent’s successor or representative.
22
If the motion is not made within 90 days after service of a statement noting the death, the
23
action by or against the decedent must be dismissed.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 25(a)(1).
24
///
25
///
26
///
27
///
28
///
1
2
3
As such, if there is no motion for substitution within 90 days of the date of this
order, the Court will dismiss the case.
DATED THIS 13th Day of January 2021.
4
5
6
MIRANDA M. DU
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?