Friedman v. Baca et al

Filing 228

ORDER - If there is no Motion for Substitution within 90 days of the date of this order, the Court will dismiss the case. Signed by Chief Judge Miranda M. Du on 1/13/2021. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - AB)

Download PDF
1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 5 *** 6 KENNETH FRIEDMAN, Case No. 3:17-cv-00433-MMD-WGC Plaintiff, 7 ORDER v. 8 ISIDRO BACA, et al., 9 Defendants. 10 11 On July 17, 2017, Plaintiff Kenneth Friedman, then a prisoner in custody of the 12 Nevada Department of Corrections (“NDOC”), initiated this prisoner civil rights action 13 under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. (ECF No. 1-1.) On February 7, 2018, the Court issued a 14 screening order and stayed the case to give the parties an opportunity to settle their 15 dispute. (ECF No. 10.) The parties were unable to reach an agreement, and the case 16 proceeded until Magistrate Judge William G. Cobb scheduled a settlement conference 17 for January 14, 2021. (ECF No. 223.) On December 18, 2020, Defendants filed a 18 suggestion of death on the record. (ECF No. 226.) 19 Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 25(a)(1), “[i]f a party dies and the claim 20 is not extinguished, the court may order substitution of the proper party. A motion for 21 substitution may be made by any party or by the decedent’s successor or representative. 22 If the motion is not made within 90 days after service of a statement noting the death, the 23 action by or against the decedent must be dismissed.” Fed. R. Civ. P. 25(a)(1). 24 /// 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// 1 2 3 As such, if there is no motion for substitution within 90 days of the date of this order, the Court will dismiss the case. DATED THIS 13th Day of January 2021. 4 5 6 MIRANDA M. DU CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?