Banks v. Song et al

Filing 3

ORDER - This action is dismissed. Petitioner is denied a certificate of appealability. Clerk shall enter judgment accordingly. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 7/21/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 9 *** 10 FREDERICK BANKS, 11 12 13 14 Case No. 3:17-cv-00440-MMD-VPC Petitioner, ORDER v. SOO SONG, et al., Respondents. 15 16 In this case, on July 20, 2017, Frederick Banks, who is apparently incarcerated at 17 the Northeast Ohio Correctional Center, in Youngstown, Ohio, awaiting trial in a federal 18 criminal action, submitted a “Complaint for a Writ of Quo Warranto, Prohibition and 19 Mandamus” (ECF No. 1-1, p. 1) (hereafter, “petition”). 20 Banks did not pay the filing fee for this action. He attached to his petition what 21 appears to be an application to proceed in forma pauperis (ECF No. 1-1 at 2); however, 22 that application is not on the form approved by this Court, and it does not include all the 23 information required by this Court for such an application. 24 25 Furthermore, Banks’ petition is plainly meritless. This Court has no jurisdiction over the individuals or subject matter described in Banks’ petition. 26 Therefore, this case will be summarily dismissed. 27 It is therefore ordered that this action is dismissed. 28 It is further ordered that the petitioner is denied a certificate of appealability. 1 It is further ordered that the Clerk of the Court enter judgment accordingly. 2 3 DATED THIS 21st day of July 2017. 4 5 MIRANDA M. DU UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?