Garmong v. Tahoe Regional Planning Agency et al

Filing 173

ORDER granting ECF No. 172 Stipulation for Extension of Time. Plaintiff may have an additional 14 days, to and including November 8, 2021, within which to file an opposition to the motion for fees (ECF No. 168 ). Signed by Judge Robert C. Jones on 10/21/2021. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SC)

1
2
3
4
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEVADA

6
7
8

GREGORY O. GARMONG,

9
10

Plaintiff,
vs.

11
12
13

TAHOE REGIONAL PLANNING
AGENCY et al,

3:17-cv-00444-RCJ-WGC
ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION FOR
EXTENSION OF TIME FOR PLAINTIFF TO
OPPOSE DEFENDANTS’ JOINT MOTION
FOR ATTORNEYS’ FEES
(First request)

Defendants.

14
15

The parties to this action, through their respective undersigned counsel of record,

16

stipulate that the plaintiff may have to and including November 8, 2021 in which to file

17

points and authorities in opposition to the Defendants’ Joint Motion for Attorneys’ Fees and

18

Costs filed October 11, 2021 (ECF No. 168).

19
20
21
22

This is the first stipulation for extension of time to file an opposition to this motion.
On September 9, 2021, this Court entered its Order dismissing the Plaintiff’s first
amended complaint with prejudice. ECF No. 159. The Order further directed: “Defendants

23

shall file a motion for attorney fees providing a basis for such a reasonable award within

24

thirty days of the issuance of this order.” Id. at 16:16-17. The defendants timely filed their

25

joint motion for attorneys’ fees on October 11, 2021. ECF No. 168. Under LR 7-2(b), the

26
27
28

plaintiff has 14 days within which to file opposition points and authorities. The current
1

1

deadline is October 25, 2021.

2

The parties have stipulated that the Plaintiff may have an additional 14 days, to and

3

including November 8, 2021, within which to file an opposition to the motion for fees. The

4

plaintiff requested the stipulation to allow additional time to research and write the

5
6
7
8
9
10

opposition because of the large amount of fees requested, requiring a review of over four
years of litigation. Under the stipulation, reply points and authorities would be due 14 days
after the plaintiff files the opposition.
DATED: October 20, 2021

13

/S/ Carl M. Hebert
CARL M. HEBERT
State Bar No. 250
2215 Stone View Drive
Sparks, Nevada 89436

14

Attorney for Plaintiff Gregory O. Garmong

11
12

15
16
17
18
19
20
21

DATED: October 20, 2021

/S/ James A. Heard
James A. Heard (admitted pro hac vice)
MACKENZIE &, ALBRITTON LLP
155 Sansome Street, Suite 800
San Francisco, California 94104
Attorneys for Defendants Complete Wireless Consulting, Inc. and Maria Kim

22
23
24
25
26
27
28

2

1

DATED: October 20, 2021

2

LEONARD LAW, PC

3

/S/ Debbie Leonard
DEBBIE LEONARD
State Bar No. 8260
955 South Virginia Street, Suite 220
Reno, Nevada 89502

4
5
6
7
8
9

Attorneys for Defendants Tahoe Regional Planning Agency and TRPA individuals
DATED: October 20, 2021

NEWMEYER & DILLION, LLP

10
11
12
13
14
15

/S/ Aaron D. Lovaas
AARON D. LOVAAS
State Bar No. 5701
3800 Howard Hughes Pkwy, Suite 700
Las Vegas, Nevada 89169

Attorney for Defendants Verizon Wireless, Inc. and Crown Castle

16
17

IT IS SO ORDERED:

18
19
20

_______________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

21

DATED: October 21, 2021

22
23
24
25
26
27
28

3