Garmong v. Tahoe Regional Planning Agency et al
Filing
32
ORDER granting ECF No. 31 Stipulation : Response to ECF No. 17 Motion to Dismiss due by 12/8/2017. Signed by Judge Robert C. Jones on 11/30/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM) Modified on 11/30/2017 for spelling (DRM).
1
2
3
CARL M. HEBERT, ESQ.
Nevada Bar #250
202 California Avenue
Reno, NV 89509
(775) 323-5556
carl@cmhebertlaw.com
4
Attorney for plaintiff Garmong
5
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
6
7
8
GREGORY O. GARMONG,
3:17-cv-00444-RCJ-WGC
9
Plaintiff,
10
vs.
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
TAHOE REGIONAL PLANNING AGENCY,
JOHN MARSHALL, in his official and
individual capacities;
BRIDGET CORNELL, in her official and
individual capacities;
JOANNE MARCHETTA, in her official and
individual capacities;
JIM BAETGE, in his official and
individual capacities;
JAMES LAWRENCE, in his official and
individual capacities;
BILL YEATES, in his official and
individual capacities;
SHELLY ALDEAN, in her official and
individual capacities;
MARSHA BERKBIGLER, in her official and
individual capacities;
CASEY BEYER, in his official and
individual capacities;
TIMOTHY CASHMAN, in his official and
individual capacities;
BELINDA FAUSTINOS, in her official and
individual capacities;
TIM CARLSON, in his official and
individual capacities;
AUSTIN SASS, in his official and
individual capacities;
NANCY McDERMID, in her official and
individual capacities;
BARBARA CEGAVSKE, in her official and
individual capacities;
MARK BRUCE, in his official and
individual capacities;
SUE NOVASEL, in his official and
STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION
OF TIME TO FILE OPPOSITION
(First Request)
1
2
3
4
individual capacities;
LARRY SEVASON, in his official and
individual capacities;
E. CLEMENT SHUTE, JR., in his official
and individual capacities;
MARIA KIM; VERIZON WIRELESS, INC.;
COMPLETE WIRELESS CONSULTING,
INC., and CROWN CASTLE,
5
Defendants.
6
7
On November 10, 2017 defendants TAHOE REGIONAL PLANNING AGENCY;
8
JOHN MARSHALL; BRIDGET CORNELL; JOANNE MARCHETTA; JIM BAETGE; JAMES
9
LAWRENCE;
BILL YEATES; SHELLY ALDEAN; MARSHA BERKBIGLER; CASEY
10
BEYER; TIMOTHY CASHMAN; BELINDA FAUSTINOS; TIM CARLSON; AUSTIN SASS;
11
NANCY McDERMID; BARBARA CEGAVSKE; MARK BRUCE; SUE NOVASEL; LARRY
12
SEVASON and E. CLEMENT SHUTE, JR. (collectively, the “TRPA” defendants) filed their
13
motion to dismiss. (# 17). Defendants CROWN CASTLE and VERIZON WIRELESS, INC.
14
filed a joinder in the motion to dismiss on November 13, 2017. (# 23). Defendants
15
COMPLETE WIRELESS CONSULTING, INC. and MARIA KIM have an extension of time
16
to file their answer or responsive motion by November 30, 2017. (# 28). The plaintiff’s
17
opposition to the motion to dismiss is currently due on November 24, 2017.
18
Given the scope and complexity of the legal issues presented in the motion to
19
dismiss, and the fact that the opposition is due the day after the Thanksgiving holiday, the
20
TRPA defendants, defendants COMPLETE WIRELESS CONSULTING, INC. and MARIA
21
KIM, and the plaintiff stipulate, under the authority of LR IA 6-1, that the plaintiff may have
22
to and including December 8, 2017 by which to file his opposition to the motion to dismiss.
23
DATED : November 21, 2017
CARL M. HEBERT, ESQ.
24
By: /S/ Carl M. Hebert
Carl M. Hebert, Esq.
NSB # 250
25
26
Counsel for the plaintiff
27
28
-2-
1
Continuation of Stipulation for Extension of Time to File Opposition in 3:17-cv-00444-RCJWGC
2
3
DATED : November 21, 2017
McDONALD CARANO, LLP
4
By: /S/ Matthew C. Addison
Matthew C. Addison, Esq.
NSB # 4201
Debbie Leonard, Esq.
NSB # 8260
5
6
7
Counsel for TRPA defendants
8
9
10
DATED : November 21, 2017
NEWMEYER & DILLION, LLP
By: /S/ Aaron D. Lovaas
Aaron D. Lovaas, Esq.
SBN # 5701
11
12
Counsel for defendants Crown
Castle and Verizon Wireless, Inc.
13
14
15
16
IT IS SO ORDERED:
17
18
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
19
20
DATED: __________________________
November 30, 2017
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-3-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?