Banks v. Warden et al
Filing
6
ORDER denying ECF No. 5 Motion to Vacate; a certificate of appealability, to the extent required in this procedural context, is DENIED; Clerk to add AG as counsel for respondent and e-serve AG with order; matter is referred to the W arden of the Northeast Ohio Correctional Center; Clerk directed to SEND copy of order to Warden La Rose (mailed 11/17/2017); Clerk directed to designate petitioner as restricted filer on docket and shall accept no further filings from petitioner other than a notice of appeal from this order and/or the order and judgment of dismissal . Signed by Judge Howard D. McKibben on 11/17/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KW)
1
2
3
4
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
5
6
7
FREDERICK BANKS, as “Next Friend”
for O.J. Simpson,
8
9
Petitioner,
vs.
3:17-cv-00452-HDM-VPC
ORDER
10
11
12
WARDEN,
Respondent.
13
14
This closed habeas matter under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 comes before the Court on
15
petitioner’s motion (ECF No. 5) to vacate the order and final judgment of dismissal. The
16
motion was filed within the time period for seeking relief under Rule 59 of the Federal Rules
17
of Civil Procedure.
18
The Court dismissed this action without prejudice because petitioner failed to properly
19
commence the action by submitting a properly completed pauper application on the required
20
form with all required financial attachments. The Court found that dismissal of the improperly-
21
commenced action without prejudice would not result in substantial prejudice because the
22
Ohio state inmate’s assertion of “next friend” standing to file a habeas petition for former
23
Nevada state inmate O.J. Simpson was frivolous and fanciful on its face.
24
Nothing in the present motion leads to a contrary conclusion either with regard to the
25
basis for the dismissal without prejudice in the first instance or the Court’s finding regarding
26
the absence of substantial prejudice.
27
28
IT THEREFORE IS ORDERED that petitioner’s motion (ECF No. 5) to vacate is
DENIED.
1
2
IT FURTHER IS ORDERED that a certificate of appealability, to the extent required in
this procedural context, is DENIED.
3
IT FURTHER IS ORDERED, pursuant to Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2254
4
Cases, that the Clerk of Court shall make informal electronic service upon respondents by
5
adding Nevada Attorney General Adam P. Laxalt as counsel for respondents and directing
6
a notice of electronic filing of this order to his office. No response is required from
7
respondents other than to respond to any orders of a reviewing court.
8
IT FURTHER IS ORDERED that this matter is referred to the Warden of the Northeast
9
Ohio Correctional Center for consideration of possible institutional disciplinary sanctions
10
and/or loss of sentencing credits under Ohio law based upon the filing of a frivolous judicial
11
proceeding. The Clerk accordingly shall SEND a copy of this order to:
12
13
Mr. Christopher La Rose, Warden
Northeast Ohio Correctional Center
2240 Hubbard Road
Youngstown, Ohio 44505
14
15
IT FURTHER IS ORDERED that the Clerk shall designate petitioner as a restricted filer
16
on the docket sheet and shall accept no further filings from petitioner in this matter other than
17
a notice of appeal from this order and/or the order and judgment of dismissal.
18
DATED: November 16, 2017.
19
20
21
22
__________________________________
HOWARD D. MCKIBBEN
United States District Judge
23
24
25
26
27
28
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?