Banks v. Warden et al

Filing 6

ORDER denying ECF No. 5 Motion to Vacate; a certificate of appealability, to the extent required in this procedural context, is DENIED; Clerk to add AG as counsel for respondent and e-serve AG with order; matter is referred to the W arden of the Northeast Ohio Correctional Center; Clerk directed to SEND copy of order to Warden La Rose (mailed 11/17/2017); Clerk directed to designate petitioner as restricted filer on docket and shall accept no further filings from petitioner other than a notice of appeal from this order and/or the order and judgment of dismissal . Signed by Judge Howard D. McKibben on 11/17/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KW)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA 5 6 7 FREDERICK BANKS, as “Next Friend” for O.J. Simpson, 8 9 Petitioner, vs. 3:17-cv-00452-HDM-VPC ORDER 10 11 12 WARDEN, Respondent. 13 14 This closed habeas matter under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 comes before the Court on 15 petitioner’s motion (ECF No. 5) to vacate the order and final judgment of dismissal. The 16 motion was filed within the time period for seeking relief under Rule 59 of the Federal Rules 17 of Civil Procedure. 18 The Court dismissed this action without prejudice because petitioner failed to properly 19 commence the action by submitting a properly completed pauper application on the required 20 form with all required financial attachments. The Court found that dismissal of the improperly- 21 commenced action without prejudice would not result in substantial prejudice because the 22 Ohio state inmate’s assertion of “next friend” standing to file a habeas petition for former 23 Nevada state inmate O.J. Simpson was frivolous and fanciful on its face. 24 Nothing in the present motion leads to a contrary conclusion either with regard to the 25 basis for the dismissal without prejudice in the first instance or the Court’s finding regarding 26 the absence of substantial prejudice. 27 28 IT THEREFORE IS ORDERED that petitioner’s motion (ECF No. 5) to vacate is DENIED. 1 2 IT FURTHER IS ORDERED that a certificate of appealability, to the extent required in this procedural context, is DENIED. 3 IT FURTHER IS ORDERED, pursuant to Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 4 Cases, that the Clerk of Court shall make informal electronic service upon respondents by 5 adding Nevada Attorney General Adam P. Laxalt as counsel for respondents and directing 6 a notice of electronic filing of this order to his office. No response is required from 7 respondents other than to respond to any orders of a reviewing court. 8 IT FURTHER IS ORDERED that this matter is referred to the Warden of the Northeast 9 Ohio Correctional Center for consideration of possible institutional disciplinary sanctions 10 and/or loss of sentencing credits under Ohio law based upon the filing of a frivolous judicial 11 proceeding. The Clerk accordingly shall SEND a copy of this order to: 12 13 Mr. Christopher La Rose, Warden Northeast Ohio Correctional Center 2240 Hubbard Road Youngstown, Ohio 44505 14 15 IT FURTHER IS ORDERED that the Clerk shall designate petitioner as a restricted filer 16 on the docket sheet and shall accept no further filings from petitioner in this matter other than 17 a notice of appeal from this order and/or the order and judgment of dismissal. 18 DATED: November 16, 2017. 19 20 21 22 __________________________________ HOWARD D. MCKIBBEN United States District Judge 23 24 25 26 27 28 -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?