Cardenas-Ornelas v. Baker et al

Filing 68

ORDER granting ECF No. 67 Motion to Extend Time re ECF No. 22 Second Amended Petition. Answer/Response due by 10/8/2020. No further extensions will be granted. Signed by Chief Judge Miranda M. Du on 10/8/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - LW)

Download PDF
1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 5 LUIS CARDENAS-ORNELAS, 6 7 8 Petitioner, 11 ORDER v. RENEE BAKER, et al., Respondents. 9 10 Case No. 3:17-cv-00461-MMD-CLB This habeas matter is before the Court on Respondents’ fourth Motion for Enlargement of Time (ECF No. 67). 12 The Court’s prior order stated: “no further extensions will be granted with respect 13 to Respondents’ answer.” (ECF No. 64.) Counsel subsequently requested a six-day 14 extension due to an “unforeseeable family emergency” (ECF No. 65), and the Court 15 reluctantly allowed the additional six days. The current motion seeks one additional day 16 because counsel did not factor in the time necessary for her supervisor to review the draft 17 answer before filing. 18 It is therefore ordered that Respondents’ fourth Motion for Enlargement of Time 19 (ECF No. 67) is granted. Respondents have until October 8, 2020, to respond to 20 Petitioner’s Second Amended Petition (ECF No. 22). No further extensions will be 21 granted. 22 DATED THIS 8th Day of October 2020. 23 24 25 26 27 28 MIRANDA M. DU CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?