Turner v. LA Sheriff's Office et al

Filing 7

ORDER that the Magistrate Judge's Reports and Recommendation ECF No. 5 is ADOPTED AND ACCEPTED; Plaintiff's Application for In Forma Pauperis ECF No. 1 is DENIED; that this action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE; Clerk directed to close case. Signed by Judge Robert C. Jones on 3/9/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KW)

Download PDF
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 4 5 JOHN TURNER, 6 CASE NO.: 3:17-CV-00475-RCJ-WGC Plaintiff, ORDER 7 v. 8 LOS ANGELES SHERIFF’S OFFICE, et al., 9 Defendants. _______________________________________ 10 11 Before the Court is the Reports and Recommendations of U.S. Magistrate Judge (ECF No. 51) 12 entered on January 29, 2018, recommending that the Plaintiff’s Application for In Forma Pauperis (ECF 13 No. 1) be denied. On February 12, 2018 Plaintiff filed his Objections to Report and Recommendation 14 (ECF No. 6), but failed to comply with the Report and Recommendation which ordered Plaintiff to pay 15 the full $400 filing fee within 30 days, or his action will be dismissed without prejudice. 16 The Court has conducted it’s de novo review in this case, has fully considered the objections of 17 the Plaintiff, the pleadings and memoranda of the parties and other relevant matters of record pursuant 18 to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule IB 3-2. The Court determines that the Magistrate Judge’s 19 Reports and Recommendation (ECF No. 5) entered on January 29, 2018, should be ADOPTED AND 20 ACCEPTED. 21 22 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Plaintiff’s Application for In Forma Pauperis (ECF No. 1) is DENIED. 23 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for 24 Plaintiff’s failure to comply with the Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 5). The Clerk of the Court 25 shall close this case. IT IS SO ORDERED this 9th day of March, 2018. 26 27 28 _____________________________________ ROBERT C. JONES 1 Refers to court’s docket number.

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?