Union Pacific Railroad Company v. Winecup Ranch, LLC et al

Filing 114

ORDER granting ECF No. 113 Stipulation for Extension of Time re ECF Nos. 111 and 112 Motions. Responses due by February 28, 2020. Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 1/28/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - AB)

`

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11

Case 3:17-cv-00477-LRH-CLB Document 113 Filed 01/27/20 Page 1 of 2

William E. Peterson (1528)
[e-mail]
Wayne Klomp (10109)
[e-mail]
SNELL & WILMER, L.L.P.
50 West Liberty Street, Suite 510
Reno, NV 89501
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
David J. Jordan (Utah Bar No. 1751)
[e-mail]
Michael R. Menssen (Utah Bar No. 15424)
[e-mail]
STOEL RIVES LLP
201 S. Main Street, Suite 1100
Salt Lake City, UT 84111
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Attorneys for Defendant
Winecup Gamble, Inc.

12
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
13
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
14
15

UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, a
Delaware Corporation,

16
17
18
19
20
21

CLB
Case No. 3:17-cv-00477-LRH-VPC
STIPULATION AND ORDER FOR
EXTENSION OF TIME FOR
DEFENDANT WINECUP GAMBLE,
INC. TO RESPOND TO PLAINTIFF’S
FIRST AND SECOND MOTIONS IN
LIMINE

Plaintiff,
v.
WINECUP GAMBLE, INC., a Nevada
Corporation,

(FIRST REQUEST)

Defendant.

Pursuant to LR II 7-1 and LR IA 6-1, Plaintiff Union Pacific Railroad Company

22

(“Plaintiff”), by and through its undersigned counsel, and Defendant Winecup Gamble, Inc.

23

(“Defendant”), by and through its undersigned counsel, hereby stipulate and agree that Defendant

24

has an extension of time, up to and including February 28, 2020, to file its response to Plaintiff’s

25
26
27
28

First Motion in Limine: to Exclude Meteorological Opinions of Matthew Lindon and to Appoint a
Neutral Expert, and to file its response to Plaintiff’s Second Motion in Limine: to Exclude
Hydrological Opinions of Matthew Lindon and to Appoint a Neutral Expert. Defendant’s
responses are currently due on January 31, 2020
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
FOR EXTENSION OF TIME

-1-

Case No. 3:17-CV-00477-LRH-VPC

Case 3:17-cv-00477-LRH-CLB Document 113 Filed 01/27/20 Page 2 of 2

1

The parties represent this Stipulation is based on a meet and confer conference wherein

2

the parties agreed that if either party filed a motion in limine in January, responses would be due

3

at the end of February. The parties represent this stipulation is made in good faith and not for the

4

purposes of delay. The parties have not previously applied for any extensions of time related to
the briefing schedule for motions in limine.

5
6
7

Accordingly, the parties request the Court order the deadline for Defendant to respond to
Plaintiff’s First and Second Motions in Limine be extended to February 28, 2020.
DATED: January 27, 2020

DATED: January 27, 2020

/s/ Wayne Klomp
David J. Jordan (Utah Bar No. 1751)
Michael R. Menssen (Utah Bar No. 15424)
STOEL RIVES LLP
201 S. Main Street, Suite 1100
Salt Lake City, UT 84111

/s/ Riley C. Mendoza
Gary M. Elden (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)
Riley C. Mendoza (Admitted Pro Hac Vice)
SHOOK HARDY & BACON LLP
111 S. Wacker Drive
Chicago, IL 60657

William E. Peterson (Bar No. 1528)
Wayne Klomp (Bar No. 10109)
SNELL & WILMER, LLP
50 West Liberty Street, Suite 510
Reno, NV 89501

Michael R. Kealy (Bar No. 971)
Ashley C. Nikkel (Bar No. 12838)
PARSONS BEHLE & LATIMER
50 W. Liberty Street, Suite 750
Reno, NV 89501

Attorneys for Defendant
Winecup Gamble, Inc.

Attorneys for Plaintiff
Union Pacific Railroad Company

8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22

IT IS SO ORDERED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED this 28th day of January, 2020.

23

ORDER

________________________________________
________________________________
UNITED STATE DISTRICT JUDGE
LARRY R. HICKS
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
Dated:____________________________

24
25
26
27
28

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
FOR EXTENSION OF TIME

-2-

Case No. 3:17-CV-00477-LRH-VPC