Union Pacific Railroad Company v. Winecup Ranch, LLC et al

Filing 117

ORDER granting ECF No. 116 Motion for Leave to File Excess Pages. Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 2/27/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - LW)

Download PDF
` 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 Case 3:17-cv-00477-LRH-CLB Document 116 Filed 02/26/20 Page 1 of 4 William E. Peterson (1528) wpeterson@swlaw.com Wayne Klomp (10109) wklomp@swlaw.com SNELL & WILMER, L.L.P. 50 West Liberty Street, Suite 510 Reno, NV 89501 Telephone: (775) 785-5440 Facsimile: (775) 785-5441 David J. Jordan (Utah Bar No. 1751) david.jordan@stoel.com Michael R. Menssen (Utah Bar No. 15424) michael.menssen@stoel.com STOEL RIVES LLP 201 S. Main Street, Suite 1100 Salt Lake City, UT 84111 Telephone: (801) 328-3131 Facsimile: (801) 578-6999 Attorneys for Defendant Winecup Gamble, Inc. UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 13 14 15 DISTRICT OF NEVADA UNION PACIFIC RAILROAD COMPANY, a Delaware Corporation, 16 17 18 19 Plaintiff, v. WINECUP GAMBLE, INC., a Nevada Corporation, 20 Case No. 3:17-cv-00477-LRH-CLB STIPULATED MOTION TO FILE AN OVERLENGTH COMBINED RESPONSE TO PLAINTIFF’S FIRST AND SECOND MOTIONS IN LIMINE AND ORDER THEREON Defendant. 21 22 Pursuant to LR 7-3(c), defendant Winecup Gamble, Inc. (“Winecup”) and plaintiff Union 23 Pacific Railroad Company (“Union Pacific”) stipulate and jointly move the court for leave for 24 Winecup to file an overlength Combined Opposition to Union Pacific’s First and Second Motions 25 in Limine to Exclude Opinions of Matthew Lindon and to Appoint a Neutral Expert (“Combined 26 Opposition”). Winecup seeks leave to file a Combined Opposition that is no more than 35 pages 27 in length, exclusive of cover sheet and tables of contents and authorities. The opposition is due 28 on February 28, 2020. See ECF No. 114. STIPULATED MOTION TO FILE AN OVERLENGTH COMBINED RESPONSE 105461395.2 0065303-00001 -1- Case No. 3:17-CV-00477-LRH-VPC Case 3:17-cv-00477-LRH-CLB Document 116 Filed 02/26/20 Page 2 of 4 1 Good cause exists to grant this motion. Union Pacific filed two separate motions in limine 2 seeking to exclude the testimony of Winecup’s expert, Matthew Lindon. See ECF No. 111 and 3 112. In opposing the first and second motions in limine, Winecup would prefer to file one 4 Combined Opposition, as the issues raised by Union Pacific in its first and second motions have 5 significant overlap. See Declaration of Michael Menssen at ¶ 2, attached as Exhibit 1. If Winecup 6 responds to each motion in limine separately, it would have 24 pages for each, for a combined 7 total of 48 pages. It is anticipated that the Combined Opposition will be approximately 35 pages, 8 which is less than the number of pages that would be permitted for two separate responses. Id. 9 Union Pacific has informed Winecup that they do not oppose Winecup’s request and has 10 agreed to this stipulated motion. Id. at ¶ 3. Accordingly, the parties request that the Court grant 11 leave for Winecup to file a Combined Opposition to Union Pacific’s First and Second Motions in 12 Limine that is 35 pages. 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 DATED: February 26, 2020 DATED: February 26, 2020 /s/ Michael R. Menssen David J. Jordan (Utah Bar No. 1751) Michael R. Menssen (Utah Bar No. 15424) STOEL RIVES LLP 201 S. Main Street, Suite 1100 Salt Lake City, UT 84111 /s/ Riley C. Mendoza (with permission) Gary M. Elden (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) Riley C. Mendoza (Admitted Pro Hac Vice) SHOOK HARDY & BACON LLP 111 S. Wacker Drive Chicago, IL 60657 William E. Peterson (Bar No. 1528) Wayne Klomp (Bar No. 10109) SNELL & WILMER, LLP 50 West Liberty Street, Suite 510 Reno, NV 89501 Michael R. Kealy (Bar No. 971) Ashley C. Nikkel (Bar No. 12838) 50 W. Liberty Street, Suite 750 Reno, NV 89501 Attorneys for Plaintiff Union Pacific Railroad Company Attorneys for Defendant Winecup Gamble, Inc. 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDER IT IS SO ORDERED. ________________________________________ DATED this 27th day of February, 2020. UNITED STATE DISTRICT JUDGE Dated:____________________________ STIPULATED MOTION TO FILE AN OVERLENGTH COMBINED RESPONSE 105461395.2 0065303-00001 -2- ________________________________ LARRY R. HICKS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Case No. 3:17-CV-00477-LRH-VPC

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?