Rockhill Insurance Companies v. CSAA Insurance Exchange et al

Filing 101

ORDER granting ECF No. 100 Stipulation to Extend Time. Responses to ECF Nos. 88 and 90 Motions for Summary Judgment due by 7/3/2019. Replies to ECF Nos. 88 and 90 Motions for Summary Judgment due by 7/29/2019. Responses to ECF No. 99 Motion to Strike due by 7/8/2019. Replies to ECF No. 99 Motion to Strike due by 7/17/2019. Signed by Judge Howard D. McKibben on 6/21/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - LH)

1
2
3
4

DANIEL T. HAYWARD (SBN 5986)
LAXALT & NOMURA, LTD.
9790 Gateway Drive – Suite 200
Reno, Nevada 89521
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
[e-mail]

5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14

ADAM H. FLEISCHER (Illinois Bar No. 6224928)
(admitted pro hac vice)
JOHN A. HUSMANN (Illinois Bar No. 6273392)
(admitted pro hac vice)
JOANNA G. SWARTOUT (Illinois Bar No. 6305993)
(admitted pro hac vice)
BATESCAREY LLP
191 North Wacker, Suite 2400
Chicago, Illinois 60606
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
Attorneys for Plaintiff,
Rockhill Insurance Companies

15
16

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

17

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

18

ROCKHILL INSURANCE COMPANIES,
Case No.: 3:17-cv-00496-HDM-WGC

19

Plaintiff,

20
21

ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION
EXTENDING TIME BY WHICH
PARTIES MAY FILE RESPONSES
AND REPLIES RELATED TO
MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY
JUDGMENT AND MOTION TO
STRIKE (FIRST REQUEST)

v.
CSAA INSURANCE EXCHANGE D/B/A
AAA INSURANCE EXCHANGE; PREMIER
RESTORATION AND REMODEL, INC.

22
23

Defendants.

24
25
26
27

Plaintiff/Counter-Defendant Rockhill Insurance Company (“Rockhill”) and Defendant
CSAA Insurance Exchange d/b/a AAA Insurance Exchange (“CSAA”), by and through their

28
LAXALT & NOMURA.
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
9790 GATEWAY DRIVE
SUITE 200
RENO, NEVADA 89521

1

1

undersigned counsel and pursuant to LR IA 6-1, stipulate and request that the Court order as

2

follows:

3

Rockhill’s Motion For Summary Judgment (ECF No. 88)

4
Rockhill and CSAA, by and through their undersigned counsel and pursuant to LR IA
5
6-1, stipulate and request that the Court order that 1) Defendant CSAA may have until and
6
including July 3, 2019 by which to file its Opposition to, and that 2) Plaintiff Rockhill have
7
8
9
10
11
12
13

until and including July 29, 2019 by which to file its Reply in support of, Rockhill’s Motion for
Summary Judgment on Rockhill’s Amended Complaint. Rockhill’s Motion for Summary
Judgment was filed on June 6, 2019. Without the foregoing extension, CSAA’s Response is
due on June 27, 2019, and Rockhill’s Reply is due on July 11, 2019. This is the first
stipulation for an extension of time to file responsive pleadings related to Rockhill’s Motion for
Summary Judgment.

14

CSAA’s Motion For Summary Judgment or Partial Summary Judgment (ECF
No. 90)

15

Rockhill and CSAA, by and through their undersigned counsel and pursuant to LR IA

16

6-1, further stipulate and request that the Court order that 1) Plaintiff Rockhill may have until

17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24

and including July 3, 2019 by which to file its Opposition to, and that 2) Defendant CSAA
have until and including July 29, 2019 by which to file its Reply in support of, CSAA’s Motion
for Summary Judgment or Partial Summary Judgment on Rockhill’s Amended Complaint.
CSAA’s Motion for Summary Judgment or Partial Summary Judgment was filed on June 7,
2019. Without the foregoing extension, Plaintiff Rockhill’s Response would be due on June
28, 2019, and Defendant CSAA’s Reply is due on July 12, 2019. This is the first stipulation for
an extension of time to file responsive pleadings related to CSAA’s Motion for Summary
Judgment or Partial Summary Judgment.

25
26

Rockhill’s Motion to Strike Affidavit Of Jeffrey Stempel (ECF No. 99)

27

Rockhill and CSAA, by and through their undersigned counsel and pursuant to LR IA

28

6-1, further stipulate and request that the Court order that 1) Defendant CSAA may have until
2

LAXALT & NOMURA.
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
9790 GATEWAY DRIVE
SUITE 200
RENO, NEVADA 89521

1

and including July 8, 2019 by which to file its Opposition to, and that 2) Plaintiff Rockhill have

2

until and including July 17, 2019 by which to file its Reply in support of, Rockhill’s Motion to

3

Strike the Affidavit of CSAA’s Retained Expert Jeffrey W. Stempel. Rockhill’s Motion to

4

Strike the Affidavit of CSAA’s Retained Expert Jeffrey W. Stempel was filed on June 12,

5

2019. Defendant CSAA’s Response is presently due on June 26, 2019. Plaintiff Rockhill’s

6

Reply is presently due on July 3, 2019. This is the first stipulation for an extension of time to

7

file responsive pleadings related to Rockhill’s Motion to Strike the Affidavit of CSAA’s

8

Retained Expert Jeffrey W. Stempel.

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16

This case is not presently scheduled for trial, such that the extensions of the briefing
schedules will not impact any trial date. The parties have requested additional time within
which to file their responsive pleadings to avoid the concentration of nearly overlapping
deadlines, and to align the deadlines for the competing Motions for Summary Judgment.
Additionally, counsel for Plaintiff, who are principally responsible for drafting its Reply in
Support of Motion for Summary Judgment on Rockhill’s Amended Complaint and its Reply in
Support of its Motion to Strike the Affidavit of CSAA’s Retained Expert Jeffrey W. Stempel
are scheduled to be out of the office during the weeks of July 1-5, 2019 and July 8-12, 2019.

17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
LAXALT & NOMURA.
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
9790 GATEWAY DRIVE
SUITE 200
RENO, NEVADA 89521

WHEREFORE, the parties stipulate and request that the Court order that the parties
may extend their deadlines as specified above and summarized below.
1. Rockhill’s Motion for Summary Judgment
CSAA’s Response due July 3
Rockhill’s Reply due July 29
2. CSAA’s Motion for Summary Judgment or Partial Summary Judgment
Rockhill’s Response due July 3
CSAA’s Reply due July 29
3. Rockhill’s Motion to Strike
CSAA’s Response due July 8
Rockhill’s Reply due July 17
3

1
DATED this 21st day of June, 2019.

DATED this 21st day of June, 2019.

3

LAXALT & NOMURA, LTD.

THE GRUNSKY LAW FIRM PC

4

/s/ Daniel T. Hayward
DANIEL T. HAYWARD (SBN 5986)
9790 Gateway Drive – Suite 200
Reno, Nevada 89521
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

/s/ Frederick H. Ebey
FREDERICK H. EBEY(CA BN 33802)
(admitted pro hac vice)
240 Westgate Drive
Watsonville, CA 95076
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

2

5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15

Adam H. Fleischer (Illinois Bar No. 6224928)
(admitted pro hac vice)
John A. Husmann (Illinois Bar No. 6273392)
(admitted pro hac vice)
Joanna G. Swartout (Illinois Bar No. 6305993)
(admitted pro hac vice)
BATES CAREY LLP
191 N. Wacker, Suite 2400
Chicago, IL 60606
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]

In Association With:
SCOTT A. GLOGOVAC
Glogovac Law LLC
3975 San Donato Loop
Reno, Nevada 89519
[e-mail]

Attorneys for Defendants
CSAA Insurance Exchange

Attorneys for Plaintiff
Rockhill Insurance Companies

16
17
18
ORDER

19
20
21

IT IS SO ORDERED.

22

DATED this 21st day of June, 2019.

23
24
25

________________________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

26
27
28
LAXALT & NOMURA.
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
9790 GATEWAY DRIVE
SUITE 200
RENO, NEVADA 89521

4