Workman v. Baca et al

Filing 51

ORDERED that Respondents' first and second motions for extension of time to file a response to the petition (ECF Nos. 44 , 46 ) are both granted nunc pro tunc. It is further ordered that Petitioner's motion for a decision and motion for relief (ECF Nos. 45 , 50 ) are both denied as set forth in this order. Signed by Chief Judge Miranda M. Du on 2/25/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)

1
2
3

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

4

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

5

***

6
7
8
9

Case No. 3:17-cv-00508-MMD-CLB

WILLIAM WORKMAN,
Petitioner,

ORDER

v.
ISIDRO BACA, et al.,

10
11

Respondents.

12

Before the Court are several motions in this pro se 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas

13

corpus matter. In Petitioner William Workman’s motion for a decision he complained that

14

Respondents had not yet filed an answer to the petition; however, Respondents had

15

sought an extension of time to file an answer. In what Workman styled as a motion for

16

relief (ECF No. 50), he basically asks the Court for clarification regarding the status of his

17

petition. The petition is briefed and will be adjudicated on the merits in due course.

18
19
20

It is therefore ordered that Respondents’ first and second motions for extension of
time to file a response to the petition (ECF Nos. 44, 46) are both granted nunc pro tunc.
It is further ordered that Petitioner’s motion for a decision and motion for relief (ECF

21

Nos. 45, 50) are both denied as set forth in this order.

22

DATED THIS 25th day of February 2020.

23
24
25
26
27
28

MIRANDA M. DU
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE