Snyder v. Lisk et al
ORDER that ECF No. 10 Plaintiffs Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Defendant is DENIED without prejudice; Plaintiff's corrected motion due by 1/12/2018 along with a proposed order to extend time for service of summons and for publication for the court's consideration. Signed by Magistrate Judge Valerie P. Cooke on 1/8/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - LH)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
RAYMOND MAX SNYDER,
ADAM LISK, et al.,
MINUTES OF THE COURT
January 8, 2018
THE HONORABLE VALERIE P. COOKE, U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE
REPORTER: NONE APPEARING
COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF(S): NONE APPEARING
COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT(S): NONE APPEARING
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS:
Before the court is plaintiff’s emergency motion to extend time for service of summons
and complaint and for order allowing publication of service (ECF No. 10). In the motion,
plaintiff refers to an affidavit of due diligence; however, this affidavit is not attached to the
motion. Therefore, plaintiff’s motion (ECF No. 10) is DENIED without prejudice. Plaintiff
shall have leave to file a corrected motion on or before Friday, January 12, 2018. Plaintiff shall
also include a proposed order to extend time for service of summons and for publication for the
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DEBRA K. KEMPI, CLERK
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?