Perez v. Baker et al

Filing 42

ORDER - Within thirty days of the date of this order, the Respondents shall locate and file either a transcript of R.B.'s testimony on October 21, 2009, or an audio recording thereof, as a supplement to the State Court record in this action. Signed by Judge Howard D. McKibben on 6/19/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - AB)

Download PDF
1 2 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 3 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 4 5 NOE ORTEGA PEREZ, Petitioner, 6 7 Case No. 3:17-cv-00538-HDM-CLB v. ORDER BAKER, WARDEN, et al., 8 Respondents. 9 This counseled habeas petition pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 10 is pending before the court for consideration of the merits of the 11 petition. In its review of the record, the court is unable to 12 locate any transcript of the testimony of the victim, R.B., on the 13 final day of trial, October 21, 2009. (See Pet. Ex. 24 (Tr. 2); 14 Resp. Ex. 36). 1 A partial transcript indicates that the testimony 15 on that day was not transcribed. (Pet. Ex. 24). The court requires 16 the entire relevant state court record, including any testimony of 17 the victim that was heard by the jury, to evaluate the petitioner’s 18 claims. Accordingly, within thirty days of the date of this order, 19 the respondents shall locate and file either a transcript of R.B.’s 20 testimony on October 21, 2009, or an audio recording thereof, as 21 a supplement to the state court record in this action. 22 IT IS SO ORDERED. 23 DATED: This 19th day of June, 2020. 24 25 ____________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 26 27 28 1 Cited exhibits are located at ECF Nos. 20 & 29. 1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?