Perez v. Baker et al
Filing
42
ORDER - Within thirty days of the date of this order, the Respondents shall locate and file either a transcript of R.B.'s testimony on October 21, 2009, or an audio recording thereof, as a supplement to the State Court record in this action. Signed by Judge Howard D. McKibben on 6/19/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - AB)
1
2
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
3
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
4
5
NOE ORTEGA PEREZ,
Petitioner,
6
7
Case No. 3:17-cv-00538-HDM-CLB
v.
ORDER
BAKER, WARDEN, et al.,
8
Respondents.
9
This counseled habeas petition pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254
10
is pending before the court for consideration of the merits of the
11
petition. In its review of the record, the court is unable to
12
locate any transcript of the testimony of the victim, R.B., on the
13
final day of trial, October 21, 2009. (See Pet. Ex. 24 (Tr. 2);
14
Resp. Ex. 36). 1 A partial transcript indicates that the testimony
15
on that day was not transcribed. (Pet. Ex. 24). The court requires
16
the entire relevant state court record, including any testimony of
17
the victim that was heard by the jury, to evaluate the petitioner’s
18
claims. Accordingly, within thirty days of the date of this order,
19
the respondents shall locate and file either a transcript of R.B.’s
20
testimony on October 21, 2009, or an audio recording thereof, as
21
a supplement to the state court record in this action.
22
IT IS SO ORDERED.
23
DATED: This 19th day of June, 2020.
24
25
____________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
26
27
28
1
Cited exhibits are located at ECF Nos. 20 & 29.
1
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?