Geo-Logic Associates, Inc. v. Metal Recovery Solutions, Inc. et al

Filing 98

ORDER - The previously filed motion for writ of execution and motion for writ of garnishment (ECF Nos. 91 , 92 ) are DENIED AS MOOT as amended motions have been filed at ECF Nos. 96 , 97 . In addition, the motion to file a redacted versi on of the supplement to the motions (ECF No. 94 ) is GRANTED as good cause exists to redact the limited confidential information contained in the supplement. Signed by Magistrate Judge William G. Cobb on 3/17/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

2

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

3 GEO-LOGIC ASSOCIATES, INC.
4

Case No.: 3:17-cv-00563-MMD-WGC

Plaintiff,

Minute Order

5 v.

Re: ECF Nos. 91, 92, 94

6 METAL RECOVERY SOLUTIONS, INC.,
et. al.,
7
Defendants.
8
9
PRESENT: THE HONORABLE WILLIAM G. COBB, U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE
10
DEPUTY CLERK: KAREN WALKER

REPORTER: NONE APPEARING

11
COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF(S): NONE APPEARING
12
COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT(S): NONE APPEARING
13
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS:
14
The previously filed motion for writ of execution and motion for writ of garnishment
15
(ECF Nos. 91, 92) are DENIED AS MOOT as amended motions have been filed at ECF Nos. 96,
16
97. In addition, the motion to file a redacted version of the supplement to the motions (ECF No.
17
94) is GRANTED as good cause exists to redact the limited confidential information contained in
18
the supplement.
19
IT IS SO ORDERED.
20
Dated: March 17, 2020.
21
DEBRA K. KEMPI, CLERK
22
23

By: __________/s/_______________
Deputy Clerk