1600 East Newlands Drive, LLC v. Amazon.com.NDVC, LLC et al
Filing
60
ORDER approving ECF No. 58 Stipulation re ECF No. 56 Motion for Summary Judgment. Response due by 1/10/2019. Signed by Judge Howard D. McKibben on 12/18/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KR)
1
2
3
4
5
6
Jessica Woelfel (NSBN 11885)
Lisa Wiltshire Alstead (NSBN 10470)
Sarah Ferguson (NSBN 14515)
McDONALD CARANO LLP
100 W. Liberty St., 10th Floor
Reno, NV 89501
Telephone: (775) 788-2000
Facsimile: (775) 788-2020
jwoelfel@mcdonaldcarano.com
lalstead@mcdonaldcarano.com
sferguson@mcdonaldcarano.com
7
8
Attorneys for Plaintiff
9
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
10
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
11
12
1600 EAST NEWLANDS DRIVE, LLC, a
Nevada limited liability company,
13
Plaintiff,
14
vs.
15
AMAZON.COM.NVDC,LLC, a Delaware
limited liability company f/k/a
AMAZON.COM.NVDC, INC.;
AMAZON.COM, INC., a Delaware
Corporation; and DOES I-X; and ROE
CORPORATIONS XI-XX, inclusive,
16
17
18
19
20
Case No.: 3:17-CV-00566-HDM-WGC
ORDER GRANTING
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME
FOR PLAINTIFF’S RESPONSE TO
DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR
SUMMARY JUDGMENT
(FIRST REQUEST)
Defendants.
AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS
21
22
Pursuant to LR IA 6-1, Plaintiff 1600 EAST NEWLANDS DRIVE, LLC (“Plaintiff”) and
23
Defendants AMAZON.COM.NVDC, LLC and AMAZON.COM, INC. (“Defendants”), hereby
24
stipulate for an extension of time for Plaintiff to file its Response to Defendants’ Motion for
25
Summary Judgment (“Response”). Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment was filed on
26
December 13, 2018. [See Docket No. 56]. Under the rules, Plaintiff’s Response is currently due
27
on January 3, 2019. The parties stipulate to extend the time permitted for Plaintiff’s Response by
28
1
one additional week with Plaintiff’s Response to now be due on January 10, 2019. This is the first
2
stipulation for an extension of time for filing Plaintiff’s Response. The reason for this stipulation
3
is to provide additional time for Plaintiff to prepare its Response given the intervening holidays,
4
the substantive nature of the issues presented, and based on a prior agreement between the parties.
5
The Defendants’ Reply deadline has not been modified and shall be due within the time frame
6
provided for in LR 7-2.
7
8
IT IS SO AGREED AND STIPULATED:
Dated: December 17, 2018
9
PERKINS COIE LLP
By: /s/ Brian Lake
Brian C. Lake
Katherine May
Perkins Coie LLP
2901 North Central Avenue, Suite 2000
Phoenix, AZ 85012-2788
10
11
12
13
David R. Koch
KOCH & SCOW LLC
11550 S. Eastern Avenue, Suite 210
Henderson, NV 89052
Attorneys for Defendants
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
Dated: December 17, 2018
McDONALD CARANO LLP
By:
/s/ Lisa Wiltshire Alstead
Jessica Woelfel
Lisa Wiltshire Alstead
Sarah Ferguson
100 West Liberty Street, 10th Floor
Reno, Nevada 89501
Attorneys for Plaintiff
ORDER
IT IS SO ORDERED:
__________________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
December 18, 2018
DATED: __________________________
28
Page 2 of 2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?