1600 East Newlands Drive, LLC v. Amazon.com.NDVC, LLC et al

Filing 60

ORDER approving ECF No. 58 Stipulation re ECF No. 56 Motion for Summary Judgment. Response due by 1/10/2019. Signed by Judge Howard D. McKibben on 12/18/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KR)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 Jessica Woelfel (NSBN 11885) Lisa Wiltshire Alstead (NSBN 10470) Sarah Ferguson (NSBN 14515) McDONALD CARANO LLP 100 W. Liberty St., 10th Floor Reno, NV 89501 Telephone: (775) 788-2000 Facsimile: (775) 788-2020 jwoelfel@mcdonaldcarano.com lalstead@mcdonaldcarano.com sferguson@mcdonaldcarano.com 7 8 Attorneys for Plaintiff 9 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 10 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 11 12 1600 EAST NEWLANDS DRIVE, LLC, a Nevada limited liability company, 13 Plaintiff, 14 vs. 15 AMAZON.COM.NVDC,LLC, a Delaware limited liability company f/k/a AMAZON.COM.NVDC, INC.; AMAZON.COM, INC., a Delaware Corporation; and DOES I-X; and ROE CORPORATIONS XI-XX, inclusive, 16 17 18 19 20 Case No.: 3:17-CV-00566-HDM-WGC ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER FOR EXTENSION OF TIME FOR PLAINTIFF’S RESPONSE TO DEFENDANTS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT (FIRST REQUEST) Defendants. AND RELATED COUNTERCLAIMS 21 22 Pursuant to LR IA 6-1, Plaintiff 1600 EAST NEWLANDS DRIVE, LLC (“Plaintiff”) and 23 Defendants AMAZON.COM.NVDC, LLC and AMAZON.COM, INC. (“Defendants”), hereby 24 stipulate for an extension of time for Plaintiff to file its Response to Defendants’ Motion for 25 Summary Judgment (“Response”). Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment was filed on 26 December 13, 2018. [See Docket No. 56]. Under the rules, Plaintiff’s Response is currently due 27 on January 3, 2019. The parties stipulate to extend the time permitted for Plaintiff’s Response by 28 1 one additional week with Plaintiff’s Response to now be due on January 10, 2019. This is the first 2 stipulation for an extension of time for filing Plaintiff’s Response. The reason for this stipulation 3 is to provide additional time for Plaintiff to prepare its Response given the intervening holidays, 4 the substantive nature of the issues presented, and based on a prior agreement between the parties. 5 The Defendants’ Reply deadline has not been modified and shall be due within the time frame 6 provided for in LR 7-2. 7 8 IT IS SO AGREED AND STIPULATED: Dated: December 17, 2018 9 PERKINS COIE LLP By: /s/ Brian Lake Brian C. Lake Katherine May Perkins Coie LLP 2901 North Central Avenue, Suite 2000 Phoenix, AZ 85012-2788 10 11 12 13 David R. Koch KOCH & SCOW LLC 11550 S. Eastern Avenue, Suite 210 Henderson, NV 89052 Attorneys for Defendants 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 Dated: December 17, 2018 McDONALD CARANO LLP By: /s/ Lisa Wiltshire Alstead Jessica Woelfel Lisa Wiltshire Alstead Sarah Ferguson 100 West Liberty Street, 10th Floor Reno, Nevada 89501 Attorneys for Plaintiff ORDER IT IS SO ORDERED: __________________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE December 18, 2018 DATED: __________________________ 28 Page 2 of 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?