BP America Inc. et al v. Yerington Paiute Tribe et al

Filing 71

ORDER that ECF Nos. 26 , 27 , and 28 Defendants' Motions to Dismiss are DENIED. Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 4/16/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KW)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 8 *** 9 10 BP AMERICA INC., and ATLANTIC RICHFIELD COMPANY, Plaintiffs, 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 Case No. 3:17-cv-0588-LRH-(WGC) v. ORDER YERINGTON PAIUTE TRIBE; LAURIE A. THOM in her official capacity as Chairman of the Yerington Paiute Tribe; YERINGTON PAIUTE TRIBAL COURT; and SANDRAMAE PICKENS in her official capacity as Judge of the Yerington Paiute Tribal Court, Defendants. 18 19 20 Before the court are defendant Sandra-Mae Pickens’ motion to dismiss (ECF No. 26), 21 defendants Yerington Paiute Tribe and Laurie A. Thom’s motion to dismiss (ECF No. 27), and 22 defendant Yerington Paiute Tribal Court’s motion to dismiss (ECF No. 28) plaintiffs BP 23 America Inc. and Atlantic Richfield Company’s complaint (ECF No. 1). 24 However, after the filing of defendants’ motions, plaintiff filed an amended complaint 25 with leave of court. See ECF No. 38. The filing of the amended complaint supersedes the 26 original complaint in its entirety. Further, the court notes and recognizes that defendants have 27 already filed new motions to dismiss the amended complaint which the court shall address in a 28 1 1 separate order. See ECF Nos. 41, 51, 53. Accordingly, defendants’ present motions to dismiss 2 the complaint are now moot and the court shall deny defendants’ motions. 3 4 5 IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that defendants’ motions to dismiss (ECF Nos. 26, 27, 28) are DENIED. 6 IT IS SO ORDERED. 7 DATED this 16th day of April, 2018. 8 _ LARRY R. HICKS UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?