Augborne v. Doctor H.D.S.P. et al

Filing 54

ORDER denying Plaintiff's ECF No. 51 Motion to Amend Complaint. Signed by Magistrate Judge William G. Cobb on 12/26/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KR)

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

2

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

3 BRIT F. AUGBORNE, III,
4

Case No.: 3:17-cv-00592-RCJ-WGC

Plaintiff

Order

5 v.

Re: ECF No. 51

6 DOCTOR HDSP, et. al.,
7

Defendants

8
9

Plaintiff has filed a motion for an order to amend his complaint, as well as a motion to

10 re-consider dismissed defendants, which was docketed as ECF Nos. 51, 52, because of the two
11 forms of relief sought. The undersigned addresses only the motion for leave to amend, as the
12 motion for reconsideration of the screening order dismissing certain defendants must be
13 addressed by District Judge Jones, who signed that order.
14

The motion to amend (ECF No. 51) is DENIED. Under Local Rule 15-1(a), a party

15 seeking leave to amend must attach the proposed amended pleading to the motion. The proposed
16 amended pleading must be complete in and of itself without reference to the superseded
17 pleading. Plaintiff's motion does not attach a proposed SAC; therefore, the motion is DENIED.
18
19 IT IS SO ORDERED.
20 Dated: December 26, 2019
21
22
23

_________________________________
William G. Cobb
United States Magistrate Judge