Robinson v. State of Nevada et al

Filing 31

ORDER granting ECF No. 29 Stipulation for Extension of Time for Plaintiff to file response to ECF No. 23 State of Nevada's Motion to Dismiss. Plaintiff's response due by 2/26/2018. Signed by Judge Howard D. McKibben on 2/12/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - LH)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 Mark Mausert NV Bar No. 2398 Cody Oldham NV Bar No.14594 930 Evans Avenue Reno, NV 89512 (775) 786-5477 Fax (775) 786-9658 mark@markmausertlaw.com Attorneys for Plaintiff 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 8 9 ALAMA ROBINSON, 10 Case No.: 3:17-cv-00611-HDM-WGC Plaintiff, 11 ORDER GRANTING STIPULATION AND ORDER TO EXTEND DEADLINE TO FILE RESPONSE TO STATE OF NEVADA’S MOTION TO DISMISS vs. 12 13 STATE OF NEVADA, LYON COUNTY AND DOES I-X, 14 Defendants. 15 / 16 Plaintiff ALAMA ROBINSON, and Defendant STATE OF NEVADA, by and through their 17 undersigned counsels of record, hereby stipulate and respectfully request an Order granting the 18 Stipulation to extend the deadline to file the Response to State of Nevada’s Motion to Dismiss our 19 First Amended Complaint from February 12, 2018 to February 26, 2018. 20 // 21 // 22 // 23 // 24 // 25 // 26 // 27 28 Page 1 of 2 1 Plaintiff requests this extension due to counsel’s heavy work load. 2 3 DATED this 12th day of February, 2018. DATED this 12th day of February, 2018. 4 MARK MAUSERT LAW OFFICE DEPUTY ATTORNEY GENERAL /s/ Shannon Richards SHANNON RICHARDS 555 E. Washington, #3900 Las Vegas, Nevada 89101 8 /s/ Mark Mausert MARK MAUSERT CODY OLDHAM 930 Evans Avenue Reno, Nevada 89512 9 Attorneys for Plaintiff Attorney for Defendant State of Nevada 5 6 7 10 11 IT IS SO ORDERED. 12 13 12th DATED this ____ day of February, 2018. 14 15 __________________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Page 2 of 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?