Antonetti v. Filson et al

Filing 16

ORDER that Petitioner's motion for third extension of time to file amended petition (ECF No. 14 ) is granted; amended petition due by 9/28/2018; Petitioner's motion for extension of time (ECF No. 13 ) is granted nunc pro tunc. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 7/17/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - LH)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 8 *** 9 JOSEPH ANTONETTI, 10 Case No. 3:17-cv-00621-MMD-VPC Petitioner, ORDER v. 11 FILSON, et al., 12 Respondents. 13 14 15 Before the Court is Petitioner’s motions for extension of time to file an amended 16 petition (ECF Nos. 13 and 14). Counsel for petitioner indicates that Antonetti was recently 17 transferred from custody in Arizona to Nevada, that counsel has had difficulty 18 communicating with Petitioner recently due to the transfer, and that counsel suspects that 19 Antonetti has not yet been able review the voluminous files from previous counsel that 20 were sent to Arizona. Counsel also notes that there are numerous grounds for relief, that 21 the state-court record is very large, and that Antonetti is serving multiple consecutive 22 sentences of life without the possibility of parole. Good cause appearing, the Court grants 23 the extension. 24 25 26 27 This Court expressly advises Petitioner that, absent extraordinary circumstances, no further extensions will be granted. It is therefore ordered that Petitioner’s motion for extension of time (ECF No. 14) is granted. Petitioner must file his amended petition on or before September 28, 2018. 28 1 1 2 3 It is further ordered that Petitioner’s motion for extension of time (ECF No. 13) is granted nunc pro tunc. DATED THIS 17th day of July 2018. 4 5 6 MIRANDA M. DU UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?