Ruiz v. Nevada Department of Corrections et al
Filing
126
ORDERED that Magistrate Judge Cobb's Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 123 ) is ADOPTED and ACCEPTED. Plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction (ECF Nos. 78 , 79 ) are DENIED AS MOOT. Signed by Judge Robert C. Jones on 8/9/2021. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
Case 3:17-cv-00643-RCJ-WGC Document 126 Filed 08/09/21 Page 1 of 2
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT CCOURT
7
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
8
9
10
CARLOS RUIZ,
Plaintiff,
11
12
v.
13
ROMEO ARANAS, et al.,
14
Defendants.
15
16
17
18
19
20
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No.: 3:17-CV-00643-RCJ-WGC
ORDER ADOPTING AND ACCEPTING
REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
(ECF NO. 123)
Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge
William G. Cobb, (ECF No. 123 1) entered on June 29, 2021, recommending that the Court deny
as moot Plaintiff’s motion for a preliminary injunction (ECF Nos. 78, 79).
21
This action was referred to Magistrate Judge Cobb under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and
22
Local Rule IB 1-4 of the Rules of Practice of the United States District Court for the District of
23
24
25
26
Nevada.
The Court has considered the pleadings and memoranda of the parties and other relevant
matters of record pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule IB 3-2.
27
28
1
Refers to Court’s docket number.
1
Case 3:17-cv-00643-RCJ-WGC Document 126 Filed 08/09/21 Page 2 of 2
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Magistrate Judge Cobb’s Report and Recommendation
(ECF No. 123) is ADOPTED and ACCEPTED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff’s motion for a preliminary injunction (ECF
Nos. 78, 79) are DENIED AS MOOT.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
Dated this 9th day of August, 2021.
8
9
10
11
ROBERT C. JONES
United States District Judge
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?