Ruiz v. Nevada Department of Corrections et al

Filing 126

ORDERED that Magistrate Judge Cobb's Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 123 ) is ADOPTED and ACCEPTED. Plaintiff's motion for a preliminary injunction (ECF Nos. 78 , 79 ) are DENIED AS MOOT. Signed by Judge Robert C. Jones on 8/9/2021. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)

Download PDF
Case 3:17-cv-00643-RCJ-WGC Document 126 Filed 08/09/21 Page 1 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT CCOURT 7 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 8 9 10 CARLOS RUIZ, Plaintiff, 11 12 v. 13 ROMEO ARANAS, et al., 14 Defendants. 15 16 17 18 19 20 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No.: 3:17-CV-00643-RCJ-WGC ORDER ADOPTING AND ACCEPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATION OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE (ECF NO. 123) Before the Court is the Report and Recommendation of United States Magistrate Judge William G. Cobb, (ECF No. 123 1) entered on June 29, 2021, recommending that the Court deny as moot Plaintiff’s motion for a preliminary injunction (ECF Nos. 78, 79). 21 This action was referred to Magistrate Judge Cobb under 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and 22 Local Rule IB 1-4 of the Rules of Practice of the United States District Court for the District of 23 24 25 26 Nevada. The Court has considered the pleadings and memoranda of the parties and other relevant matters of record pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule IB 3-2. 27 28 1 Refers to Court’s docket number. 1 Case 3:17-cv-00643-RCJ-WGC Document 126 Filed 08/09/21 Page 2 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Magistrate Judge Cobb’s Report and Recommendation (ECF No. 123) is ADOPTED and ACCEPTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff’s motion for a preliminary injunction (ECF Nos. 78, 79) are DENIED AS MOOT. IT IS SO ORDERED. Dated this 9th day of August, 2021. 8 9 10 11 ROBERT C. JONES United States District Judge 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?