Coleman v. Erogul et al

Filing 62

ORDER granting ECF No. 60 Motion to Extend Time : Defendants shall have to and including Friday, September 27, 2019, in which to respond to Plaintiff's discovery requests. Signed by Magistrate Judge William G. Cobb on 8/28/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA RONNIE MONEY COLEMAN, ) ) Plaintiff, ) vs. ) ) JOHN EROGUL, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) ____________________________________ ) 3:17-cv-00649-MMD-WGC MINUTES OF THE COURT August 28, 2019 PRESENT: THE HONORABLE WILLIAM G. COBB, U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE DEPUTY CLERK: KAREN WALKER REPORTER: NONE APPEARING COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF(S): NONE APPEARING COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT(S): NONE APPEARING MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS: Before the court is Defendants’ Motion to Extend Discovery Response Deadline (ECF No. 60). Defendants request an additional thirty (30) days to respond to Plaintiff’s discovery requests dated July 22, 2019, July 28, 2019, and August 12, 2019. Defendants’ Motion to Extend Discovery Response Deadline (ECF No. 60) is GRANTED. Defendants shall have to and including Friday, September 27, 2019, in which to respond to Plaintiff’s discovery requests. Although Defendants’ motion states “[n]o extension to the Discovery Deadline or any other deadline is necessary” (id. at 3), the extended response deadline of thirty (30) days (from August 12, 2019, to September 12, 2019) would mean Plaintiff would likely not receive Defendants’ discovery responses (with 3 days allocated for mailing to Plaintiff at ESP) until after the discovery deadline of September 13, 2019 (ECF No. 47). The court will not modify the deadlines in the current Scheduling Order (ECF No. 47) but notes such may be necessary in the future. IT IS SO ORDERED. DEBRA K. KEMPI, CLERK By: /s/______________________ Deputy Clerk

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?