Berry v. Baker et al
Filing
17
ORDER DISMISSING CASE - This action is hereby REOPENED for the purposes of granting the Petitioner's Motion to Voluntarily Dismiss (ECF No. 16 ). Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(i), the Petitioner's Motion to Voluntarily Dismiss (ECF No. 16 ) is GRANTED, and this action is hereby DISMISSED. Signed by Judge Howard D. McKibben on 9/29/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - AB)
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
8
9
10
11
12
ROBERT LOGAN BERRY, JR.,
Case No. 3:17-cv-00659-HDM-VPC
Petitioner,
v.
ORDER
WARDEN BAKER, et al.,
Respondents.
13
This represented habeas petition comes before the court on
14
petitioner’s motion to voluntarily dismiss the case (ECF No. 16).
15
On February 22, 2018, the court granted the petitioner’s
16
motion to stay this action while he pursued a motion to reopen his
17
previously dismissed petition in Case No. 3:16-cv-00470-MMD-WGC.
18
The court directed this action be administratively closed until
19
such time as the court, on motion or sua sponte, reopened the case.
20
The court in Case No. 3:16-cv-00470-MMD-WGC has granted the
21
motion to reopen proceedings and the petition in that case is now
22
fully briefed and awaiting a decision. The petitioner accordingly
23
now moves to voluntarily dismiss this case.
24
Good cause appearing, IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that this action
25
is hereby REOPENED for the purposes of granting the petitioner’s
26
motion to voluntarily dismiss (ECF No. 16).
27
28
1
1
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil
2
Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(i), the petitioner’s motion to voluntarily
3
dismiss
4
DISMISSED.
(ECF
No.
16)
is
GRANTED,
and
this
5
is
IT IS SO ORDERED.
6
action
DATED: This 29th day of September, 2020.
7
8
9
____________________________
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
hereby
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?