Berry v. Baker et al

Filing 17

ORDER DISMISSING CASE - This action is hereby REOPENED for the purposes of granting the Petitioner's Motion to Voluntarily Dismiss (ECF No. 16 ). Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(i), the Petitioner's Motion to Voluntarily Dismiss (ECF No. 16 ) is GRANTED, and this action is hereby DISMISSED. Signed by Judge Howard D. McKibben on 9/29/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - AB)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 8 9 10 11 12 ROBERT LOGAN BERRY, JR., Case No. 3:17-cv-00659-HDM-VPC Petitioner, v. ORDER WARDEN BAKER, et al., Respondents. 13 This represented habeas petition comes before the court on 14 petitioner’s motion to voluntarily dismiss the case (ECF No. 16). 15 On February 22, 2018, the court granted the petitioner’s 16 motion to stay this action while he pursued a motion to reopen his 17 previously dismissed petition in Case No. 3:16-cv-00470-MMD-WGC. 18 The court directed this action be administratively closed until 19 such time as the court, on motion or sua sponte, reopened the case. 20 The court in Case No. 3:16-cv-00470-MMD-WGC has granted the 21 motion to reopen proceedings and the petition in that case is now 22 fully briefed and awaiting a decision. The petitioner accordingly 23 now moves to voluntarily dismiss this case. 24 Good cause appearing, IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that this action 25 is hereby REOPENED for the purposes of granting the petitioner’s 26 motion to voluntarily dismiss (ECF No. 16). 27 28 1 1 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil 2 Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(i), the petitioner’s motion to voluntarily 3 dismiss 4 DISMISSED. (ECF No. 16) is GRANTED, and this 5 is IT IS SO ORDERED. 6 action DATED: This 29th day of September, 2020. 7 8 9 ____________________________ UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 hereby

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?