Broomfield v. Aranas et al

Filing 65

ORDER granting ECF Nos. 63 64 Motions : Plaintiff is advised that the court received Plaintiff's Opposition to Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 59 ) and Plaintiff's Addendum//Exhibit in Support of Plaintiff's Opposition to Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 61 ). Signed by Magistrate Judge William G. Cobb on 11/20/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA STEVEN CITY BLOOMFIELD, ) ) Plaintiff, ) vs. ) ) ROMEO ARANAS, et al., ) ) Defendants. ) ____________________________________ ) 3:17-cv-00683-MMD-WGC MINUTES OF THE COURT November 20, 2019 PRESENT: THE HONORABLE WILLIAM G. COBB, U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE DEPUTY CLERK: KAREN WALKER REPORTER: NONE APPEARING COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF(S): NONE APPEARING COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT(S): NONE APPEARING MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS: Before the court are Plaintiff’s “Motions/Notices” (ECF Nos. 63 and 64) inquiring if the court received Plaintiff’s Opposition to Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment and Plaintiff’s Addendum/Exhibit in Support of Plaintiff’s Opposition to Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment. Plaintiff is advised that the court received Plaintiff’s Opposition to Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 59) and Plaintiff’s Addendum//Exhibit in Support of Plaintiff’s Opposition to Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 61). DEBRA K. KEMPI, CLERK By: /s/______________________ Deputy Clerk

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?