Broomfield v. Aranas et al
Filing
65
ORDER granting ECF Nos. 63 64 Motions : Plaintiff is advised that the court received Plaintiff's Opposition to Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 59 ) and Plaintiff's Addendum//Exhibit in Support of Plaintiff's Opposition to Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 61 ). Signed by Magistrate Judge William G. Cobb on 11/20/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
STEVEN CITY BLOOMFIELD,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
vs.
)
)
ROMEO ARANAS, et al.,
)
)
Defendants.
)
____________________________________ )
3:17-cv-00683-MMD-WGC
MINUTES OF THE COURT
November 20, 2019
PRESENT: THE HONORABLE WILLIAM G. COBB, U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE
DEPUTY CLERK:
KAREN WALKER
REPORTER:
NONE APPEARING
COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF(S): NONE APPEARING
COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT(S): NONE APPEARING
MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS:
Before the court are Plaintiff’s “Motions/Notices” (ECF Nos. 63 and 64) inquiring if the
court received Plaintiff’s Opposition to Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment and Plaintiff’s
Addendum/Exhibit in Support of Plaintiff’s Opposition to Defendants’ Motion for Summary
Judgment.
Plaintiff is advised that the court received Plaintiff’s Opposition to Defendants’ Motion for
Summary Judgment (ECF No. 59) and Plaintiff’s Addendum//Exhibit in Support of Plaintiff’s
Opposition to Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (ECF No. 61).
DEBRA K. KEMPI, CLERK
By:
/s/______________________
Deputy Clerk
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?