Broomfield v. Aranas et al

Filing 89

ORDER ECF No. 79 Motion for Leave to File supplemental briefing is DENIED. Signed by Magistrate Judge William G. Cobb on 5/19/2020. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)

Case 3:17-cv-00683-MMD-WGC Document 89 Filed 05/19/20 Page 1 of 1

1

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

2

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

3

Case No.: 3:17-cv-00683-MMD-WGC
STEVEN CITY BROOMFIELD,

4

Order
Plaintiff

5

Re: ECF No. 79
v.

6
ROMEO ARANAS, et. al.,
7
Defendants
8
9
Before the court is Plaintiff's motion for leave to file supplemental briefing in reply to
10
Defendants' motion for summary judgment, stating that he did not know he had to file a reply to
11
the motion. (ECF No. 79.)
12
Defendants filed their motion for summary judgment. (ECF No. 40.) Plaintiff filed a
13
response. (ECF Nos. 59, 61, 67, 72.) Defendants filed a reply brief. (ECF No. 77.)
14
Plaintiff also filed his own motion for summary judgment. (ECF Nos. 47, 47-1, 50-1.)
15
Defendants filed a response. (ECF Nos. 53, 55-1 to 55-8.) Plaintiff filed a reply. (ECF No. 78.)
16
Briefing on these motions is complete. Plaintiff need not file a reply to Defendants'
17
motion. He is only permitted to file his response/opposition, and then Defendants file a reply
18
brief, which completes the briefing on the motion. See Local Rule 7-2.
19
Therefore, Plaintiff's motion (ECF No. 79) is DENIED.
20
IT IS SO ORDERED.
21
Dated: May 19, 2020
22
23

_________________________________
William G. Cobb
United States Magistrate Judge