Fields v. Dzurenda
Filing
26
ORDER dismissing with prejudice this action; denying a certificate of appealability; directing Clerk to enter judgment accordingly and close case. Signed by Chief Judge Miranda M. Du on 12/3/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KR)
1
2
3
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
4
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
5
***
6
KEVIN FIELDS,
7
Case No. 3:17-cv-00691-MMD-CLB
Petitioner,
ORDER
v.
8
JAMES DZURENDA, et al.,
9
Respondents.
10
11
Three recent orders have been sent to pro se 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas corpus
12
petitioner Kevin Fields at High Desert State Prison—his address of record—but have
13
been returned by the U.S. Postal Service as undeliverable. (ECF Nos. 18, 19, 23, 24, 25.)
14
The Court notes that the Nevada Department of Corrections website reflects that Fields
15
expired his sentence about a year ago. Local Rule IA 3-1 requires “an attorney or pro se
16
party to immediately file with the court written notification of any change of mailing
17
address. . . . The notification must include proof of service on each opposing party or the
18
party’s attorney. Failure to comply with this rule may result in the dismissal of the action,
19
entry of default judgment, or other sanctions. . . .” Because petitioner has failed to file
20
written notification of change of address with the Court, the Court will dismiss this action
21
with prejudice.
22
It is therefore ordered that this action is dismissed with prejudice.
23
It is further ordered that a certificate of appealability is denied, as jurists of reason
24
would not find the dismissal of the petition to be debatable.
25
///
26
///
27
///
28
///
1
The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment accordingly and close this case.
2
DATED THIS 3rd day of December 2019.
3
4
MIRANDA M. DU, CHIEF JUDGE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?