Fields v. Dzurenda

Filing 26

ORDER dismissing with prejudice this action; denying a certificate of appealability; directing Clerk to enter judgment accordingly and close case. Signed by Chief Judge Miranda M. Du on 12/3/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KR)

Download PDF
1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 5 *** 6 KEVIN FIELDS, 7 Case No. 3:17-cv-00691-MMD-CLB Petitioner, ORDER v. 8 JAMES DZURENDA, et al., 9 Respondents. 10 11 Three recent orders have been sent to pro se 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas corpus 12 petitioner Kevin Fields at High Desert State Prison—his address of record—but have 13 been returned by the U.S. Postal Service as undeliverable. (ECF Nos. 18, 19, 23, 24, 25.) 14 The Court notes that the Nevada Department of Corrections website reflects that Fields 15 expired his sentence about a year ago. Local Rule IA 3-1 requires “an attorney or pro se 16 party to immediately file with the court written notification of any change of mailing 17 address. . . . The notification must include proof of service on each opposing party or the 18 party’s attorney. Failure to comply with this rule may result in the dismissal of the action, 19 entry of default judgment, or other sanctions. . . .” Because petitioner has failed to file 20 written notification of change of address with the Court, the Court will dismiss this action 21 with prejudice. 22 It is therefore ordered that this action is dismissed with prejudice. 23 It is further ordered that a certificate of appealability is denied, as jurists of reason 24 would not find the dismissal of the petition to be debatable. 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// 1 The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment accordingly and close this case. 2 DATED THIS 3rd day of December 2019. 3 4 MIRANDA M. DU, CHIEF JUDGE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?