Kramer et al v. JPMorgan Chase Bank, N.A. et al

Filing 13

ORDER that ECF No. 8 Stipulation for Extension of Time for Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. to respond to ECF No. 1 Complaint is DENIED without prejudice; this case is stayed until 2/22/2018 or until each of the Plaintiffs p ost the required security; Defendant Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. will have twenty days thereafter to respond to Plaintiffs' Complaint. Signed by Magistrate Judge William G. Cobb on 1/23/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - LH)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF NEVADA LEO KRAMER, AUDREY KRAMER, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) vs. ) ) JPMORGAN CHASE BANK, N.A., et al., ) ) Defendants. ) ________________________________________) 3:18-cv-00001-MMD-WGC MINUTES OF THE COURT January 23, 2018 PRESENT: THE HONORABLE WILLIAM G. COBB, U.S. MAGISTRATE JUDGE DEPUTY CLERK: KATIE LYNN OGDEN REPORTER: NONE APPEARING COUNSEL FOR PLAINTIFF(S): NONE APPEARING COUNSEL FOR DEFENDANT(S): NONE APPEARING MINUTE ORDER IN CHAMBERS: Before the court is the parties’ Stipulation for Extension of Time for Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. to Respond to Complaint (ECF No. 8). The Stipulation for Extension of Time for Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. to Respond to Complaint (ECF No. 8) is DENIED without prejudice. In view of the court’s orders (ECF Nos. 11, 12), the case is stayed for thirty (30) days or until Plaintiffs and each of them post the required security. Defendant Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. shall have twenty (20) days thereafter to respond to Plaintiffs’ Complaint. IT IS SO ORDERED. DEBRA K. KEMPI, CLERK By: /s/ Deputy Clerk

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?