Reyes v. Keefe Group, LLC

Filing 6

ORDER granting ECF No. 5 Motion to Extend Time : Keefe Group, LLC answer/response to ECF No. 1 Complaint due by 3/5/2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge William G. Cobb on 2/7/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)

Download PDF
Case 3:18-cv-00004-LRH-WGC Document 5 Filed 02/07/18 Page 1 of 4 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 MICHELLE D. ALARIE, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 11894 ARMSTRONG TEASDALE LLP 3770 Howard Hughes Parkway, Suite 200 Las Vegas, Nevada 89169 Telephone: 702.678.5070 Facsimile: 702.878.9995 malarie@armstrongteasdale.com DANIEL O’TOOLE, ESQ. (will comply with LR IA 11-2 within 45 days) Missouri Bar No. 38051 ARMSTRONG TEASDALE LLP 7700 Forsyth Boulevard, Suite 1800 St. Louis, Missouri 63105 Telephone: 314.621.5070 Facsimile: 314.621.5065 dotoole@armstrongteasdale.com Attorneys for Defendant Keefe Commissary Network, LLC 12 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 13 FOR THE DISTRICT OF NEVADA 14 15 JOHANA REYES, 16 17 18 19 20 Plaintiff, vs. KEEFE GROUP, LLC and DOE Defendants I-X, Defendants. Case No.: 3:18-cv-00004-LRH-WGC ORDER GRANTING UNOPPOSED MOTION TO EXTEND DEFENDANT’S DEADLINE TO RESPOND TO COMPLAINT AND [PROPOSED] ORDER [FIRST REQUEST] 21 22 Defendant Keefe Commissary Network, LLC (incorrectly identified in the Complaint as 23 Keefe Group, LLC) (“Keefe”), by and through its counsel, Armstrong Teasdale LLP, hereby 24 respectfully requests an extension of Keefe’s deadline to respond to the Complaint from February 7, 25 2018, to March 5, 2018. Plaintiff Johana Reyes (“Reyes”) has consented to the requested extension. 26 This is the first request to extend this particular deadline. 27 On January 4, 2018, Reyes filed her Complaint against Keefe alleging claims for sexually 28 hostile work environment, disability discrimination, and retaliation. See ECF No. 1. The Summons 1 Case 3:18-cv-00004-LRH-WGC Document 5 Filed 02/07/18 Page 2 of 4 1 and Complaint were served on Keefe on January 17, 2018. See ECF No. 4. Therefore, pursuant to 2 Rule 12(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Keefe’s response to the Complaint is due on 3 February 7, 2018. 4 On February 5, 2018, undersigned counsel contacted Reyes’ counsel to discuss stipulating to 5 extend Keefe’s response deadline. Reyes’ counsel agreed to continue Keefe’s answer deadline from 6 February 7, 2018, to March 5, 2018. Counsels, however, were not able to agree on language for a 7 stipulation, therefore, Keefe files this unopposed motion. 8 Good cause for this extension exists. Counsel for Keefe was recently retained, and therefore, 9 requires additional time to adequately review and consider this matter in anticipation of responding 10 to the Complaint. This short extension will not prejudice any parties nor affect any current deadlines 11 because this case is still in its infancy – no parties have answered the Complaint and a case 12 management order had not been entered. This stipulation is entered into in good faith and is not 13 intended to unduly delay the proceedings. 14 /// 15 /// 16 /// 17 /// 18 /// 19 /// 20 /// 21 /// 22 /// 23 /// 24 /// 25 /// 26 /// 27 /// 28 /// 2 Case 3:18-cv-00004-LRH-WGC Document 5 Filed 02/07/18 Page 3 of 4 1 2 Accordingly, Keefe requests that an order be entered extending the deadline for Keefe to respond to the Complaint from February 7, 2018, to March 5, 2018. 3 4 Dated this 7th day of February, 2018. ARMSTRONG TEASDALE, LLP 5 By: /s/ Michelle D. Alarie________________ MICHELLE D. ALARIE, ESQ. Nevada Bar No. 11894 3770 Howard Hughes Parkway, Suite 200 Las Vegas, Nevada 89169 Telephone: 702.678.5070 Facsimile: 702.878.9995 malarie@armstrongteasdale.com 6 7 8 9 10 DANIEL O’TOOLE, ESQ. Missouri Bar No. 38051 7700 Forsyth Boulevard, Suite 1800 St. Louis, Missouri 63105 dotoole@armstrongteasdale.com 11 12 13 Attorneys for Defendant Keefe Commissary Network, LLC 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 ORDER IT IS SO ORDERED. ____________________________________ UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE DATED: February 7, 2018 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?