Boston Heart Diagnostics Corporation v. MD Labs, Inc.

Filing 43

ORDER granting ECF No. 42 Stipulation to Dismiss with Prejudice. Signed by Judge Robert C. Jones on 4/18/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - LH)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 L. Edward Humphrey, Esq. (Nevada Bar No. 9066) HUMPHREY LAW PLLC 140 Washington Street, Suite 210 Reno, Nevada 89503 Tel: 775.420.3500 Fax: 775.683.9917 ed@hlawnv.com Wayne F. Dennison (admitted pro hac vice) BROWN RUDNICK LLP One Financial Center Boston, MA 02111 Tel: 617.856.8200 Fax: 617.289.0438 wdennison@brownrudnick.com 10 11 Attorneys for Boston Heart Diagnostics Corporation 12 13 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 14 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 15 16 17 BOSTON HEART DIAGNOSTICS CORPORATION, Plaintiff, 18 19 20 vs. Case No.: 3:18-cv-00006 STIPULATION TO DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE MD LABS, INC. 21 Defendant. 22 23 24 Plaintiff Boston Heart Diagnostics Corporation (“BHDX”) and Defendant MD Labs, Inc. (“MD Labs,” together with BHDX, the “Parties”), through their counsel, hereby stipulate, 25 26 27 28 subject to the approval of the Court, to the following: 1. The Parties agree and stipulate that the above-captioned action, Boston Heart Diagnostics Corporation v. MD Labs, Inc., No. 3:18-cv-0006, which alleges infringement of 1 1 U.S. Patent No. 8,455,194 against MD Labs (the “Action”), is hereby dismissed with prejudice. 2 3 2. The Parties agree and stipulate that MD Labs has not asserted any counterclaims in the Action and will not be precluded in any future litigation from challenging the 4 5 6 infringement, validity, or enforceability of U.S. Patent No. 8,455,194 and, further, that BHDX will not be precluded from asserting any defenses thereto. 7 8 9 3. The Parties further agree and stipulate that each party shall bear its own attorneys’ fees and costs incurred in, or in connection with, the Action. IT IS SO STIPULATED. 10 11 12 DATED: April 17, 2018 HUMPHREY LAW PLLC PERKINS COIE LLP By: /s/ L. Edward Humphrey L. Edward Humphrey, Esq. 140 WASHINGTON STREET, SUITE 210 RENO, NEVADA 89503 Tel: 775.420.3500 Fax: 775.683.9917 ed@hlawnv.com By: /s/ Daniel T. Shvodian Daniel T. Shvodian, Esq. 3150 Porter Drive PALO ALTO, CA 94304 Tel: 650.838.4413 Fax: 650.838.4350 DShvodian@perkinscoie.com -And- -And- Wayne F. Dennison (BBO #558879) (admitted pro hac vice) BROWN RUDNICK LLP One Financial Center Boston, MA 02111 Telephone: 617.856.8200 Facsimile: 617.289.0438 E-mail: wdennison@brownrudnick.com Michael R. Kealy Ashley C. Nikkel Parsons Behle & Latimer 50 W. Liberty Street Suite 750 Reno, NV 89501 775-323-1601 Fax: 775-348-7250 Email: mkealy@parsonsbehle.com anikkel@parsonsbehle.com 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 Attorneys for Boston Heart Diagnostics Corporation Attorneys for MD Labs, Inc. 27 28 2 1 IT IS SO ORDERED: 2 3 4 __________________________ DATED: ______________ April 18, 2018 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3 1 CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE 2 3 4 5 6 Pursuant to FRCP 5(b) and 5(d), I certify under penalty of perjury that I am an attorney at Humphrey Law PLLC, 140 Washington Street, Suite 210, Reno, Nevada 89503, and that on April 17, 2018, I served the foregoing documents described below: • STIPULATION TO DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE filed April 17, 2018. I served the above-named document(s) by the following means to the persons as listed 7 8 9 below: ☒ ECF System, to all those persons registered with the Court’s CM/ECF system in 10 this case. 11 ☐ 12 Reno, Nevada, upon all those persons listed below: 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 United States mail, First-Class, postage fully prepaid, deposited for mailing at Daniel T Shvodian Perkins Coie LLP 3150 Porter Drive Palo Alto, CA 94340-1212 Michael R. Kealy Ashley C. Nikkel Parsons Behle & Latimer 50 W. Liberty Street, Suite 750 Reno, NV 89501 I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct. DATED: April 17, 2018. HUMPHREY LAW PLLC 22 23 By: /s/ L. Edward Humphrey L. Edward Humphrey, Esq. 24 25 26 62999849 v1 63001245 v3 27 28 4

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?