Boston Heart Diagnostics Corporation v. MD Labs, Inc.
Filing
43
ORDER granting ECF No. 42 Stipulation to Dismiss with Prejudice. Signed by Judge Robert C. Jones on 4/18/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - LH)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
L. Edward Humphrey, Esq. (Nevada Bar No. 9066)
HUMPHREY LAW PLLC
140 Washington Street, Suite 210
Reno, Nevada 89503
Tel: 775.420.3500
Fax: 775.683.9917
ed@hlawnv.com
Wayne F. Dennison (admitted pro hac vice)
BROWN RUDNICK LLP
One Financial Center
Boston, MA 02111
Tel: 617.856.8200
Fax: 617.289.0438
wdennison@brownrudnick.com
10
11
Attorneys for Boston Heart Diagnostics
Corporation
12
13
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
14
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
15
16
17
BOSTON HEART DIAGNOSTICS
CORPORATION,
Plaintiff,
18
19
20
vs.
Case No.: 3:18-cv-00006
STIPULATION TO DISMISS WITH
PREJUDICE
MD LABS, INC.
21
Defendant.
22
23
24
Plaintiff Boston Heart Diagnostics Corporation (“BHDX”) and Defendant MD Labs,
Inc. (“MD Labs,” together with BHDX, the “Parties”), through their counsel, hereby stipulate,
25
26
27
28
subject to the approval of the Court, to the following:
1.
The Parties agree and stipulate that the above-captioned action, Boston Heart
Diagnostics Corporation v. MD Labs, Inc., No. 3:18-cv-0006, which alleges infringement of
1
1
U.S. Patent No. 8,455,194 against MD Labs (the “Action”), is hereby dismissed with prejudice.
2
3
2.
The Parties agree and stipulate that MD Labs has not asserted any counterclaims
in the Action and will not be precluded in any future litigation from challenging the
4
5
6
infringement, validity, or enforceability of U.S. Patent No. 8,455,194 and, further, that BHDX
will not be precluded from asserting any defenses thereto.
7
8
9
3.
The Parties further agree and stipulate that each party shall bear its own
attorneys’ fees and costs incurred in, or in connection with, the Action.
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
10
11
12
DATED: April 17, 2018
HUMPHREY LAW PLLC
PERKINS COIE LLP
By: /s/ L. Edward Humphrey
L. Edward Humphrey, Esq.
140 WASHINGTON STREET, SUITE 210
RENO, NEVADA 89503
Tel: 775.420.3500
Fax: 775.683.9917
ed@hlawnv.com
By: /s/ Daniel T. Shvodian
Daniel T. Shvodian, Esq.
3150 Porter Drive
PALO ALTO, CA 94304
Tel: 650.838.4413
Fax: 650.838.4350
DShvodian@perkinscoie.com
-And-
-And-
Wayne F. Dennison (BBO #558879)
(admitted pro hac vice)
BROWN RUDNICK LLP
One Financial Center
Boston, MA 02111
Telephone: 617.856.8200
Facsimile: 617.289.0438
E-mail: wdennison@brownrudnick.com
Michael R. Kealy
Ashley C. Nikkel
Parsons Behle & Latimer
50 W. Liberty Street
Suite 750
Reno, NV 89501
775-323-1601
Fax: 775-348-7250
Email: mkealy@parsonsbehle.com
anikkel@parsonsbehle.com
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
Attorneys for Boston Heart
Diagnostics Corporation
Attorneys for MD Labs, Inc.
27
28
2
1
IT IS SO ORDERED:
2
3
4
__________________________
DATED: ______________
April 18, 2018
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
1
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
2
3
4
5
6
Pursuant to FRCP 5(b) and 5(d), I certify under penalty of perjury that I am an attorney
at Humphrey Law PLLC, 140 Washington Street, Suite 210, Reno, Nevada 89503, and that on
April 17, 2018, I served the foregoing documents described below:
•
STIPULATION TO DISMISS WITH PREJUDICE filed April 17, 2018.
I served the above-named document(s) by the following means to the persons as listed
7
8
9
below:
☒
ECF System, to all those persons registered with the Court’s CM/ECF system in
10
this case.
11
☐
12
Reno, Nevada, upon all those persons listed below:
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
United States mail, First-Class, postage fully prepaid, deposited for mailing at
Daniel T Shvodian
Perkins Coie LLP
3150 Porter Drive
Palo Alto, CA 94340-1212
Michael R. Kealy
Ashley C. Nikkel
Parsons Behle & Latimer
50 W. Liberty Street, Suite 750
Reno, NV 89501
I declare under penalty of perjury that the foregoing is true and correct.
DATED: April 17, 2018.
HUMPHREY LAW PLLC
22
23
By: /s/ L. Edward Humphrey
L. Edward Humphrey, Esq.
24
25
26
62999849 v1
63001245 v3
27
28
4
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?