Rimer v. Baker et al
Filing
20
ORDER - Answer/response to ECF No. 17 First Amended Petition due by 11/30/2019; reply due 45 days after service of answer. If Rs file a motion, P will have 45 days to respond; and Rs Reply due 21 days after service of response. Signed by Chief Judge Miranda M. Du on 10/1/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
8
***
9
STANLEY RIMER,
Case No. 3:18-cv-00023-MMD-WGC
Petitioner,
10
ORDER
v.
11
RENEE BAKER, et al.,
12
Respondents.
13
14
Petitioner has filed a first amended petition (ECF No. 17). The Court has reviewed
15
it pursuant to Rule 4 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases in the United States
16
District Courts. The Court will direct Respondents to file a response.
17
It is therefore ordered that Respondents will have 60 days from the date of entry of
18
this order to answer or otherwise respond to the first amended petition (ECF No. 17).
19
Respondents must raise all potential affirmative defenses in the initial responsive
20
pleading, including untimeliness, lack of exhaustion, and procedural default. The Court will
21
not entertain successive motions to dismiss.
22
It further is ordered that if Respondents file and serve an answer, then they must
23
comply with Rule 5 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases in the United States
24
District Courts. Petitioner then will have 45 days from the date on which the answer is
25
served to file a reply.
26
///
27
///
28
///
1
It is further ordered that if Respondents file and serve a motion, then Petitioner will
2
have 45 days from the date of service of the motion to file a response to the motion.
3
Respondents then will have 21 days from the date of service of the response to file a reply.
4
DATED THIS 1st day of October 2019.
5
6
7
MIRANDA M. DU
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?