Rimer v. Baker et al

Filing 55

ORDER granting ECF No. 54 Motion to Extend Time. Respondents will have up to and including January 22, 2021, to file a reply in support of their Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. 27 ). Signed by Chief Judge Miranda M. Du on 1/20/2021. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - AB)

Download PDF
Case 3:18-cv-00023-MMD-WGC Document 55 Filed 01/20/21 Page 1 of 1 1 2 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 5 *** 6 STANLEY RIMER, Case No. 3:18-cv-00023-MMD-WGC Petitioner, 7 ORDER v. 8 RENEE BAKER, et al., 9 Respondents. 10 11 Respondents were required to file their reply in support of their motion to dismiss 12 by January 19. 2021. (ECF No. 53.) On that date, Respondents filed an unopposed 13 motion for enlargement of time (sixth request) of three days, which would allow them to 14 to file their reply by January 22, 2021. (ECF No. 54.) The Court finds that Respondents’ 15 motion for extension of time is made in good faith and not solely for the purpose of delay, 16 and there is good cause for the extension of time requested. 17 It is therefore ordered that Respondents' unopposed motion for enlargement of 18 time (sixth request) (ECF No. 54) is granted. Respondents will have up to and including 19 January 22, 2021, to file a reply in support of their motion to dismiss (ECF No. 27). 20 DATED THIS 20th Day of January 2021. 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 MIRANDA M. DU CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?