Rimer v. Baker et al

Filing 79

ORDER granting ECF No. 77 Motion to Extend Time. Respondents will have up to and including January 25, 2022, to file a response to the motion for an evidentiary hearing (ECF No. 74 ). Signed by Chief Judge Miranda M. Du on 1/25/2022. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - HKL)

Case 3:18-cv-00023-MMD-CSD Document 79 Filed 01/25/22 Page 1 of 1

1
2
3

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

4

DISTRICT OF NEVADA

5

***

6

STANLEY RIMER,

Case No. 3:18-cv-00023-MMD-CSD
Petitioner,

7

ORDER

v.
8
RENEE BAKER, et al.,
9
Respondents.
10
11

Respondents have filed an unopposed motion for enlargement of time (second

12

request) (ECF No. 77) to respond to Petitioner’s motion for an evidentiary hearing (ECF

13

No. 74.). The Court finds Respondents’ motion is made in good faith and not solely for the

14

purpose of delay, and therefore good cause exists to grant the enlargement of time.

15

It is therefore ordered that Respondents’ unopposed motion for enlargement of time

16

(second request) (ECF No. 77) is granted. Respondents will have up to and including

17

January 25, 2022, to file a response to the motion for an evidentiary hearing (ECF No. 74).

18

DATED THIS 25th Day of January 2022.

19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

MIRANDA M. DU
CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE