Ach Foam Technologies, Inc v. Icon Reno Property Owner Pool 3 Nevada, LLC
Filing
65
ORDER granting ECF No. 64 Stipulation : Response to ECF No. 52 Motion to Dismiss Counterclaim due by 6/14/2019. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 5/20/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DRM)
1
2
3
4
5
6
G. DAVID ROBERTSON, ESQ. (NV Bar 1001)
KIRK C. JOHNSON, ESQ. (NV Bar 4299)
Robertson, Johnson, Miller & Williamson
50 West Liberty Street, Suite 600
Reno, Nevada 89501
Telephone No.: (775) 329-5600
Facsimile No.: (775) 348-8300
gdavid@nvlawyers.com
kirk@nvlawyers.com
Attorneys for Defendant/Counterclaimant ICON RENO
PROPERTY OWNER POOL 3 NEVADA, LLC
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
9
MFR HOLDCO, LLC, a foreign limited
liability company,
Case No. 3:18-cv-00034-MMD-WGC
10
Plaintiff,
11
vs.
12
13
ICON RENO PROPERTY OWNER POOL 3
NEVADA, LLC, a foreign limited liability
Company,
14
Defendants.
15
16
ICON RENO PROPERTY OWNER POOL 3
NEVADA, LLC, a foreign limited liability
Company,
17
Counterclaimant.
18
19
20
21
vs.
MFR HOLDCO, LLC,; ACH FOAM
TECHNOLOGIES, INC.; FRANK
KIESECKER, JR., individually; RICHARD L.
WALLER, individually; MICHAEL S.
HUEMPFNER, individually,
Counterdefendants.
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Robertson, Johnson,
Miller & Williamson
50 West Liberty Street,
Suite 600
Reno, Nevada 89501
STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO
MOTION TO DISMISS COUNTERCLAIM (FIFTH REQUEST)
WHEREAS, Counterdefendants Kiesecker, Waller and Huempfner filed a Motion to
Dismiss Counterclaim (ECF 52) on February 26, 2019 (“the Motion”);
WHEREAS, Counterclaimant’s opposition to the Motion is currently due on or before
May 17, 2019;
STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO MOTION TO DISMISS COUNTERCLAIM
(FIFTH REQUEST)
PAGE 1
1
2
WHEREAS, the parties participated in a mediation on March 4, 2019, and reached a
tentative settlement of the action;
3
WHEREAS, the parties appear to have hopefully resolved the last remaining issue with
4
the latest settlement agreement changes now awaiting final approval from a few of the interested
5
parties;
6
WHEREAS, the terms of the settlement agreement have led some of the parties to seek
7
insurance coverage for issues addressed in the agreement and which insurance issues those
8
parties are still working through with their insurers and which need to be resolved before the
9
parties can execute the settlement agreement;
10
11
WHEREAS, the settlement will obviate the need for Counterclaimant to file an
opposition to the Motion and save judicial resources; and
12
WHEREAS, the parties agree that the Counterclaimant should not be required to expend
13
time and money opposing the Motion if the parties can finish finalizing their settlement, such
14
that an extension of time for Counterclaimaint to file said opposition, while the parties work to
15
finalize their settlement, makes good sense,
16
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and between the undersigned, that
17
Counterclaimant Icon Reno Property Owner Pool 3 Nevada, LLC shall have to and including
18
June 14, 2019, to file its opposition to Plaintiff’s Motion to Dismiss Counterclaim in this action.
19
IT IS SO STIPULATED:
20
DATED: May 17, 2019
DATED: May 17, 2019.
21
HOLLAND & HART LLP
ROBERTSON, JOHNSON
MILLER & WILLIAMSON
22
By: /s/ Matthew B. Hippler
Matthew B. Hippler, Esq.
Frank Z. LaForge, Esq.
Attorneys for Plaintiff/
Counterdefendants
23
24
25
26
By: /s/ Kirk C. Johnson
Kirk C. Johnson, Esq.
Attorneys for Defendant/
Counterclaimant
ORDER
IT IS SO ORDERED:
27
28
Robertson, Johnson,
Miller & Williamson
50 West Liberty Street,
Suite 600
Reno, Nevada 89501
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
May 20, 2019
DATED: ________________________
STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO MOTION TO DISMISS COUNTERCLAIM
(FIFTH REQUEST)
PAGE 2
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
1
2
Pursuant to FRCP 5(b) and Local Rule 5-4, I hereby certify that I am an employee of
3
Robertson, Johnson, Miller & Williamson, over the age of eighteen, and not a party to the within
4
action.
5
STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO MOTION TO DISMISS
6
COUNTERCLAIM (FIFTH REQUEST) and thus, pursuant to LR 5-4, caused same to be
7
served by electronic mail on the following Filing Users:
8
9
10
11
I further certify that on the 17th day of May, 2019, I electronically filed this
Matthew B. Hippler, Esq. (SBN 7015)
Frank Z. LaForge, Esq. (SBN 12246)
Holland & Hart LLP
5441 Kietzke Lane, Second Floor
Reno, NV 89511
mhippler@hollandhart.com
lzlaforge@hollandhart.com
12
13
14
/s/ Teresa W. Stovak
An Employee of Robertson, Johnson,
Miller & Williamson
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Robertson, Johnson,
Miller & Williamson
50 West Liberty Street,
Suite 600
Reno, Nevada 89501
STIPULATION FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO MOTION TO DISMISS COUNTERCLAIM
(FIFTH REQUEST)
PAGE 3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?