Winkler v. Baca et al

Filing 43

ORDER that Petitioner's motion for extension of time (ECF No. 41 ) is granted; Petitioner will have until June 30, 2019, to file his reply to Respondents' opposition to Petitioner's motion for reconsideration; Petitioner's request to extend his copy work account limit (ECF No. 42 ) is granted. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 6/19/2019. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - LH)

Download PDF
1 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 2 DISTRICT OF NEVADA 3 *** 4 GARY JOSEPH WINKLER, 5 Petitioner, ORDER v. 6 7 Case No. 3:18-cv-00115-MMD-WGC ISIDRO BACA, et al., Respondents. 8 9 Petitioner’s motion for extension of time (ECF No. 41) is granted. Petitioner will 10 have until June 30, 2019, to file his reply to Respondents’ opposition to Petitioner’s motion 11 for reconsideration. 12 In connection with his request for an extension of time, Petitioner also has filed a 13 motion to extend his copy work limit. (ECF No. 42.) An inmate has no constitutional right 14 to free photocopying. Johnson v. Moore, 948 F.2d 517, 521 (9th Cir. 1991). Pursuant to 15 NDOC administrative regulation 722.01(7)(D), inmates “can only accrue a maximum of 16 $100 debt for copy work expenses for all cases, not per case.” In this district, courts have 17 found that they can order a prison to provide limited photocopying when it is necessary 18 for an inmate to provide copies to the court and other parties. See Allen v. Clark Cty. Det. 19 Ctr., 2:10-cv-00857-RLH, 2011 WL 886343, at *2 (D. Nev. Mar. 11, 2011). In this case, 20 the Court grants Petitioner’s request (ECF No. 42) to extend his copy work account limit 21 by another $5.00 so that he may file and serve his reply in this case. The Nevada 22 Department of Corrections must therefore extend Petitioner’s prison copy work limit by 23 $5.00. 24 DATED THIS 19th day of June 2019. 25 26 27 28 MIRANDA M. DU UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?