Winkler v. Baca et al
Filing
8
ORDER denying Petitioner's ECF No. 7 Motion for Appointment of Counsel. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 4/12/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - KR)
1
2
3
4
5
6
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
7
DISTRICT OF NEVADA
8
***
9
GARY JOSEPH WINKLER,
10
11
12
13
14
15
Case No. 3:18-cv-00115-MMD-WGC
Petitioner,
ORDER
v.
ISIDRO BACA, et al.,
Respondents.
This pro se habeas petition comes before the Court on petitioner’s motion for
appointment of counsel (ECF No. 7).
16
There is no constitutional right to appointed counsel for a federal habeas corpus
17
proceeding. Pennsylvania v. Finley, 481 U.S. 551, 555 (1987); Bonin v. Vasquez, 999
18
F.2d 425, 428 (9th Cir. 1993). The decision to appoint counsel is generally discretionary.
19
Chaney v. Lewis, 801 F.2d 1191, 1196 (9th Cir. 1986), cert. denied, 481 U.S. 1023 (1987);
20
Bashor v. Risley, 730 F.2d 1228, 1234 (9th Cir.), cert. denied, 469 U.S. 838 (1984).
21
However, counsel must be appointed if the complexities of the case are such that denial
22
of counsel would amount to a denial of due process, and where the petitioner is a person
23
of such limited education as to be incapable of fairly presenting his claims. See Chaney,
24
801 F.2d at 1196; see also Hawkins v. Bennett, 423 F.2d 948 (8th Cir.1970).
25
The petition in this case is sufficiently clear in presenting the issues that petitioner
26
wishes to raise, and the issues are not complex. Petitioner’s assertion that he will have
27
more credibility and be better able to conduct an investigation and litigate his petition with
28
appointed counsel is not a basis for appointing counsel. Therefore, the Court concludes
1
that counsel is not justified in this case, and the motion for appointment of counsel will be
2
denied.
3
4
5
It is therefore ordered that petitioner’s motion for appointment of counsel (ECF No.
7) is denied.
DATED THIS 12th day of April 2018.
6
7
8
MIRANDA M. DU
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?